Cited by 70Vector-borne infectious diseasesInsect Pest Control StrategiesDermatological diseases and infestations

Pilot Study Assessing the Effectiveness of Long-Lasting Permethrin-Impregnated Clothing for the Prevention of Tick Bites

Vaughn, Meagan F., Meshnick, Steven R.·2011·Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tick-borne diseases such as Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and ehrlichiosis are a significant concern for many thousands of workers who have frequent and unavoidable exposure to tick-infested habitats. Many North Carolina state employees with outdoor occupations report multiple tick bites each year, indicating that existing tick preventive strategies may be underutilized or ineffective. Treatment of clothing with permethrin, a nontoxic chemical with insecticidal, knockdown, and repellent properties, is highly effective against ticks. However, most permethrin products must be reapplied after several washings to maintain insecticidal activity. Recently, a factory-based method for long-lasting permethrin impregnation of clothing has been developed by Insect Shield, Inc., that allows clothing to retain insecticidal activity for over 70 washes. METHODS: A nonrandomized open label pilot study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Insect Shield-treated clothing for the prevention of tick bites among 16 outdoor workers from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality under actual field conditions. Participants completed questionnaires at the start of follow-up (March, 2008) and at the end of follow-up (September, 2008), and tick bites and outdoor work hours were reported on weekly tick bite logs for the entire follow-up period. RESULTS: Subjects wearing Insect Shield-treated clothing had a 93% reduction (p < 0.0001) in the total incidence of tick bites compared to subjects using standard tick bite prevention measures. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that long-lasting permethrin-impregnated clothing may be highly effective against tick bites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/vbz.2010.0158

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn, M. F., & Meshnick, S. R.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2011-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
869-875
ISSN
  • 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7759
OpenAlex
W2092886100
Cited by
70
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
Keywords
tick bite prevention, tick-borne diseases, Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichiosis, outdoor workers, occupational exposure, tick repellents
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Bites and Stings, Clothing, Female, Humans, Insecticides, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Ticks, Occupational Exposure, Permethrin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review