Cited by 50Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyAmphibian and Reptile BiologyInsects and Parasite Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk Factors for Invasive Reptile-Associated Salmonellosis in Children

Open access

Abstract

Reptile-associated salmonellosis (RAS) in children has been reported primarily due to direct contact with turtles, but recently also due to indirect contact with more exotic reptiles, causing disease in infants. To evaluate risk factors for RAS, we reviewed the RAS cases published in the literature since 1965. A case was defined as a child ≤18 years of age with an epidemiological link by identification of Salmonella enterica in cultures from both the affected child and the exposed reptile. We identified a total of 177 otherwise healthy children (median age 1.0 years, range 2 days to 17.0 years). RAS manifested mainly with gastrointestinal disease, but 15% presented with invasive RAS, including septicemia, meningitis, and bone and joint infection. The children with invasive RAS were significantly younger than children with noninvasive disease (median age 0.17 and 2.0 years, p<0.0001). RAS is most frequently seen after exposure to turtles (42%). However, children with invasive RAS had been exposed more often (p≤0.001) to reptiles other than turtles, including iguanas, bearded dragons, snakes, chameleons, and geckos. Children exposed to those latter reptiles usually kept indoors were younger than children exposed to turtles mostly kept outdoors (p<0.0001). RAS in children is significantly associated with invasive disease at young age, in particular infants <6 months of age. Exposure to reptiles, other than turtles, kept indoors is associated with RAS at younger age and more invasive disease. This finding is helpful for recognizing or even preventing invasive RAS in young infants that are at highest risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/vbz.2012.1133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific immune deficiency may increase risk for particular pathogens; newborn infants may be at increased risk of invasive salmonellosis, and pregnant women may be more likely to acquire lymphocytic choriomeningitis.

    “Furthermore, the specific immune deficiency may increase risk for particular pathogens; for example, newborn infants may be at increased risk of invasive salmonellosis, and pregnant women may be more likely to acquire lymphocytic choriomeningitis.”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The area of specific immune deficiency and particular pathogen risk is poorly understood.

    “However, this area is poorly understood. 16”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [16]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00437-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0910497107 · DOI
  3. 10.1086/529146 · DOI
  4. 10.1172/JCI33998 · DOI
  5. 10.1542/peds.99.3.399 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/381594 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00124-0 · DOI
  8. 10.2460/javma.1974.165.11.1015 · DOI
  9. Ward L. Salmonella perils of pet reptiles. Commun Dis Public Health, 2000; 3:2–3.
  10. 10.1089/vbz.2010.0239 · DOI
  11. 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4802-4803.2002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sauteur, P. M. M., Relly, C., Hug, M., Wittenbrink, M. M., & Berger, C.
Affiliations
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Sauteur, Patrick M. Meyer
Venue
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2013-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
419-421
ISSN
  • 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7759
OpenAlex
W2081091832
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Insects and Parasite Interactions
Keywords
reptile-associated salmonellosis, invasive salmonellosis, children, infants, risk factors, turtles, exotic reptiles, Salmonella enterica, septicemia, meningitis, bone and joint infections, zoonoses
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Reptiles, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Salmonella Infections, Salmonella Infections, Animal, Switzerland, Zoonoses, Immunocompromised Host, Meningitis, Bacterial, Sepsis, Salmonella enterica

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review