Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Traditional Therapies for Skin Wound Healing

Open access
Pereira, Rúben F., Bártolo, Paulo J.·2016·Advances in Wound Care

Abstract

Significance: The regeneration of healthy and functional skin remains a huge challenge due to its multilayer structure and the presence of different cell types within the extracellular matrix in an organized way. Despite recent advances in wound care products, traditional therapies based on natural origin compounds, such as plant extracts, honey, and larvae, are interesting alternatives. These therapies offer new possibilities for the treatment of skin diseases, enhancing the access to the healthcare, and allowing overcoming some limitations associated to the modern products and therapies, such as the high costs, the long manufacturing times, and the increase in the bacterial resistance. This article gives a general overview about the recent advances in traditional therapies for skin wound healing, focusing on the therapeutic activity, action mechanisms, and clinical trials of the most commonly used natural compounds. New insights in the combination of traditional products with modern treatments and future challenges in the field are also highlighted. Recent Advances: Natural compounds have been used in skin wound care for many years due to their therapeutic activities, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and cell-stimulating properties. The clinical efficacy of these compounds has been investigated through in vitro and in vivo trials using both animal models and humans. Besides the important progress regarding the development of novel extraction methods, purification procedures, quality control assessment, and treatment protocols, the exact mechanisms of action, side effects, and safety of these compounds need further research. Critical Issues: The repair of skin lesions is one of the most complex biological processes in humans, occurring throughout an orchestrated cascade of overlapping biochemical and cellular events. To stimulate the regeneration process and prevent the wound to fail the healing, traditional therapies and natural products have been used with promising results. Although these products are in general less expensive than the modern treatments, they can be sensitive to the geographic location and season, and exhibit batch-to-batch variation, which can lead to unexpected allergic reactions, side effects, and contradictory clinical results. Future Directions: The scientific evidence for the use of traditional therapies in wound healing indicates beneficial effects in the treatment of different lesions. However, specific challenges remain unsolved. To extend the efficacy and the usage of natural substances in wound care, multidisciplinary efforts are necessary to prove the safety of these products, investigate their side effects, and develop standard controlled trials. The development of good manufacturing practices and regulatory legislation also assume a pivotal role in order to improve the use of traditional therapies by the clinicians and to promote their integration into the national health system. Current trends move to the development of innovative wound care treatments, combining the use of traditional healing agents and modern products/practices, such as nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles, Aloe vera loaded into alginate hydrogels, propolis into dressing films, and hydrogel sheets containing honey.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/wound.2013.0506

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 126 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1007/s00580-010-1087-1 · doi:10.1007/s00580-010-1087-1
  2. 10.1002/ptr.2931 · doi:10.1002/ptr.2931
  3. 10.1002/bp0601600 · doi:10.1002/bp0601600
  4. 10.2337/diacare.26.2.446 · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2.446
  5. 10.1016/S0738-081X(98)00056-X · doi:10.1016/s0738-081x(98)00056-x
  6. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.017 · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.017
  7. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.045 · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.045
  8. 10.5897/JDE10.006 · doi:10.5897/jde10.006
  9. Pellizzoni M, , Ruzickova G, , Kalhotka L, , and Lucini L: Antimicrobial activity of different Aloe barbadensis Mill. and Aloe arborescens Mill. leaf fractions. J Med Plants Res, 2012; 6: 1975.
  10. 10.1089/107555303322524553 · doi:10.1089/107555303322524553
  11. 10.1016/S0367-326X(03)00051-0 · doi:10.1016/s0367-326x(03)00051-0
  12. 10.1055/s-2005-916196 · doi:10.1055/s-2005-916196
  13. Hadfield RA, , Vlahovic TC, , and Khan MT: The use of marigold therapy for podiatric skin conditions. Foot Ankle J, 2008; 1: 1.
  14. Duran V, , Matic M, , Jovanovć M, , Mimica N, , Gajinov Z, , Poljacki M, , and Boza P: Results of the clinical examination of an ointment with marigold (Calendula officinalis) extract in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Int J Tissue React, 2005; 27: 101.
  15. 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00271-9 · doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00271-9
  16. 10.1186/1472-6882-9-34 · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-9-34
  17. 10.1096/fj.09-150789 · doi:10.1096/fj.09-150789
  18. 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.10.79091 · doi:10.12968/jowc.2010.19.10.79091
  19. 10.1155/2012/805932 · doi:10.1155/2012/805932
  20. 10.1186/1472-6882-10-48 · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-10-48
  21. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00735.x · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00735.x
  22. Ingle R, , Levin J, , and Polinder K: Wound healing with honey - a randomised controlled trial. S Afr Med J, 2006; 96: 831.
  23. 10.7748/ns.24.7.66.s54 · doi:10.7748/ns.24.7.66.s54
  24. 10.1016/j.fitote.2013.04.008 · doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2013.04.008
  25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.049 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.049
  26. 10.2310/derm.1.2005.2119 · doi:10.2310/derm.1.2005.2119
  27. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00298.x · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2007.00298.x
  28. 10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10403.x · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.10403.x
  29. 10.12968/jowc.2012.21.2.78 · doi:10.12968/jowc.2012.21.2.78
  30. 10.1136/bmj.b773 · doi:10.1136/bmj.b773
  31. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00234.x · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2010.00234.x
  32. 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.011 · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2004.08.011
  33. 10.1016/S0965-206X(04)43005-8 · doi:10.1016/s0965-206x(04)43005-8
  34. 10.1007/s00441-013-1626-6 · doi:10.1007/s00441-013-1626-6
  35. 10.1093/jac/dkq042 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09530.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09530.x
  37. 10.1159/000063369 · doi:10.1159/000063369
  38. 10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.Sup6.22431 · doi:10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.sup6.22431
  39. 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318233570d · doi:10.1097/bcr.0b013e318233570d
  40. 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.1895 · doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2011.1895
  41. Marineau ML, , Herrington MT, , Swenor KM, , and Eron LJ: Maggot debridement therapy in the treatment of complex diabetic wounds. Hawaii Med J, 2011; 70: 121.
  42. 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.11.005 · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.11.005
  43. 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.020 · doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.020
  44. 10.1007/s00402-010-1135-y · doi:10.1007/s00402-010-1135-y
  45. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00903.x · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2011.00903.x
  46. 10.1002/jbm.b.32800 · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32800
  47. 10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01115.x · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01115.x
  48. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00669.x · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2010.00669.x
  49. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00603.x · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2010.00603.x

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Pereira, R. F., & Bártolo, P. J.
Venue
Advances in Wound Care
Published
2016-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
208-229
ISSN
  • 2162-1918 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-1934
OpenAlex
W2025763370
Cited by
531
References
126
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traditional Therapies for Skin Wound Healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/wound.2013.0506
The paper
Pereira, R. F., & Bártolo, P. J. (2016). Traditional Therapies for Skin Wound Healing. Advances in Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0506

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.