Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 680

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A survey of model reduction methods for large-scale systems

Antoulas, A. C., Sorensen, D. C., Gugercin, S.·2001·Contemporary Mathematics

Abstract

An overview of model reduction methods and a comparison of the resulting algorithms is presented. These approaches are divided into two broad categories, namely SVD based and moment matching based methods. It turns out that the approximation error in the former case behaves better globally in frequency while in the latter case the local behavior is better. 1 Introduction and problem statement Direct numerical simulation of dynamical systems has been an extremely successful means for studying complex physical phenomena. However, as more detail is included, the dimensionality of such simulations may increase to unmanageable levels of storage and computational requirements. One approach to overcoming this is through model reduction. The goal is to produce a low dimensional system that has

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1090/conm/280/04630

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 680

Metadata

Authors
Antoulas, A. C., Sorensen, D. C., & Gugercin, S.
Venue
Contemporary Mathematics
Published
2001
Pages
193-219
ISSN
  • 0271-4132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-3627
OpenAlex
W1590943005
Cited by
680
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of model reduction methods for large-scale systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1090/conm/280/04630
The paper
Antoulas, A. C., Sorensen, D. C., & Gugercin, S. (2001). A survey of model reduction methods for large-scale systems. Contemporary Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/280/04630

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.