The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation
Abstract
A dimension reduction method called discrete empirical interpolation is proposed and shown to dramatically reduce the computational complexity of the popular proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method for constructing reduced-order models for time dependent and/or parametrized nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). In the presence of a general nonlinearity, the standard POD-Galerkin technique reduces dimension in the sense that far fewer variables are present, but the complexity of evaluating the nonlinear term remains that of the original problem. The original empirical interpolation method (EIM) is a modification of POD that reduces the complexity of evaluating the nonlinear term of the reduced model to a cost proportional to the number of reduced variables obtained by POD. We propose a discrete empirical interpolation method (DEIM), a variant that is suitable for reducing the dimension of systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) of a certain type. As presented here, it is applicable to ODEs arising from finite difference discretization of time dependent PDEs and/or parametrically dependent steady state problems. However, the approach extends to arbitrary systems of nonlinear ODEs with minor modification. Our contribution is a greatly simplified description of the EIM in a finite-dimensional setting that possesses an error bound on the quality of approximation. An application of DEIM to a finite difference discretization of the one-dimensional FitzHugh–Nagumo equations is shown to reduce the dimension from 1024 to order 5 variables with negligible error over a long-time integration that fully captures nonlinear limit cycle behavior. We also demonstrate applicability in higher spatial dimensions with similar state space dimension reduction and accuracy results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lehoucq, R. B., Sorensen, D. C., & Yang, C. (1998) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719628 · Cited by 2,936
Self-citationBarrault, M., Maday, Y., Nguyen, N. C., & Patera, A. T. (2004) · Comptes Rendus. Mathématique · doi:10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.006 · Cited by 1,530
Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
Willcox, K., & Peraire, J. (2002) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/2.1570 · Cited by 989
MODEL REDUCTION FOR FLUIDS, USING BALANCED PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION
ROWLEY, C. W. (2005) · International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · doi:10.1142/s0218127405012429 · Cited by 909
Karhunen–Loève procedure for gappy data
Everson, R., & Sirovich, L. (1995) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.12.001657 · Cited by 906
Interpolation Method for Adapting Reduced-Order Models and Application to Aeroelasticity
Amsallem, D., & Farhat, C. (2008) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.35374 · Cited by 710
A survey of model reduction methods for large-scale systems
Antoulas, A. C., Sorensen, D. C., & Gugercin, S. (2001) · Contemporary Mathematics · doi:10.1090/conm/280/04630 · Cited by 680
Self-citationGalerkin proper orthogonal decomposition methods for parabolic problems
Kunisch, K., & Volkwein, S. (2001) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/s002110100282 · Cited by 641
Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems
Bai, Z. (2002) · Applied Numerical Mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9274(02)00116-2 · Cited by 633
Prud'Homme, C., Rovas, D., Veroy, K., Machiels, L., Maday, Y., Patera, A. T., & Turinici, G. (2001) · Journal of Fluids Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.1448332 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems using neural networks
Hesthaven, J. S., & Ubbiali, S. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.037 · Cited by 616
(2018) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2018.2810460 · Cited by 518
Yondo, R., Andrés, E., & Valero, E. (2018) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.11.003 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaturantabut, S., & Sorensen, D. C.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2737-2764
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2049753327
- Cited by
- 1,925
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 24.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/090766498
- The paper
- Chaturantabut, S., & Sorensen, D. C. (2010). Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/090766498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.