Cited by 105Autophagy in Disease and TherapyRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Development and Disorders

Cholesterol-mediated activation of acid sphingomyelinase disrupts autophagy in the retinal pigment epithelium

Open access
Toops, Kimberly A., Tan, Li Xuan, Jiang, Zhichun, Radu, Roxana A., Lakkaraju, Aparna·2015·Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract

Autophagy is an essential mechanism for clearing damaged organelles and proteins within the cell. As with neurodegenerative diseases, dysfunctional autophagy could contribute to blinding diseases such as macular degeneration. However, precisely how inefficient autophagy promotes retinal damage is unclear. In this study, we investigate innate mechanisms that modulate autophagy in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), a key site of insult in macular degeneration. High-speed live imaging of polarized adult primary RPE cells and data from a mouse model of early-onset macular degeneration identify a mechanism by which lipofuscin bisretinoids, visual cycle metabolites that progressively accumulate in the RPE, disrupt autophagy. We demonstrate that bisretinoids trap cholesterol and bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate, an acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) cofactor, within the RPE. ASMase activation increases cellular ceramide, which promotes tubulin acetylation on stabilized microtubules. Live-imaging data show that autophagosome traffic and autophagic flux are inhibited in RPE with acetylated microtubules. Drugs that remove excess cholesterol or inhibit ASMase reverse this cascade of events and restore autophagosome motility and autophagic flux in the RPE. Because accumulation of lipofuscin bisretinoids and abnormal cholesterol homeostasis are implicated in macular degeneration, our studies suggest that ASMase could be a potential therapeutic target to ensure the efficient autophagy that maintains RPE health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1091/mbc.e14-05-1028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-polarized RPE respond to stereotypical autophagy inducers such as serum starvation, whereas well-polarized terminally differentiated primary RPE cultures do not.

    “First, whereas non-polarized RPE respond to “stereotypical” autophagy inducers such as serum starvation, well-polarized terminally differentiated primary RPE cultures do not (Toops et al., 2015).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Toops et al., 2015

  • In highly differentiated primary RPE monolayers, basal, constitutive autophagy is crucial for the clearance of long-lived proteins such as p62/sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1).

    “In highly differentiated primary RPE monolayers, basal, constitutive autophagy is crucial for the clearance of long-lived proteins such as p62/sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1), a specific autophagy substrate (Toops et al., 2015).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Toops et al., 2015

  • Polarized primary RPE do not upregulate autophagy in response to the non-specific mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, but respond to the specific mTORC1 inhibitor Torin-1.

    “Second, polarized primary RPE do not upregulate autophagy in response to the non-specific mTOR inhibitor rapamycin, but respond to the specific mTORC1 inhibitor Torin-1 (Toops et al., 2015).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Toops et al., 2015

  • Dynamic microtubules (marked by tyrosination) are required for efficient transport of autophagosomes, whereas stable microtubules (marked by acetylation) hinder autophagosome trafficking.

    “Dynamic microtubules (marked by tyrosination) are required for efficient transport of autophagosomes, whereas stable microtubules (marked by acetylation) hinder autophagosome trafficking (Toops et al., 2015; Mohan et al., 2019).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Toops et al., 2015

  • In Abca4−/− RPE, both autophagosome biogenesis and autophagic flux are inhibited.

    “In Abca4−/− RPE, both autophagosome biogenesis and autophagic flux are inhibited (Toops et al., 2015); however, in Batten, Bietti’s, and SLO diseases, autophagic defects manifest as an accumulation of LC3-positive autophagosomes and increased p62, suggestive of a block in autophagosome-lysosome fusion.”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Toops et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 105

Authors
Toops, K. A., Tan, L. X., Jiang, Z., Radu, R. A., & Lakkaraju, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health,
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Lakkaraju, Aparna
Venue
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Published
2015-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1059-1524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-4586
OpenAlex
W2002657202
Cited by
105
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Molecular Biology of the Cell (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (P30EY016665, P30EY000331)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
acid sphingomyelinase, autophagy, retinal pigment epithelium, macular degeneration, cholesterol, ceramide, tubulin acetylation, microtubules, autophagic flux, bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate, cholesterol homeostasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Ceramides, Cholesterol, Humans, Lipofuscin, Lysophospholipids, Macular Degeneration, Microtubules, Phagosomes, Retinoids, Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase, Tubulin, Mice, Knockout, Monoglycerides, Mice, Retinal Pigment Epithelium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review