Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sortilin and retromer mediate retrograde transport of Glut4 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

Pan, Xiang, Zaarur, Nava, Singh, Maneet, Morin, Peter, Kandror, Konstantin V.·2017·Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract

Sortilin is a multiligand sorting receptor responsible for the anterograde transport of lysosomal enzymes and substrates. Here we demonstrate that sortilin is also involved in retrograde protein traffic. In cultured 3T3-L1 adipocytes, sortilin together with retromer rescues Glut4 from degradation in lysosomes and retrieves it to the TGN, where insulin-­responsive vesicles are formed. Mechanistically, the luminal Vps10p domain of sortilin interacts with the first luminal loop of Glut4, and the cytoplasmic tail of sortilin binds to retromer. Ablation of the retromer does not affect insulin signaling but decreases the stability of sortilin and Glut4 and blocks their entry into the small vesicular carriers. As a result, Glut4 cannot reach the insulin-responsive compartment, and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes is suppressed. We suggest that sortilin- and retromer-mediated Glut4 retrieval from endosomes may represent a step in the Glut4 pathway vulnerable to the development of insulin resistance and diabetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1091/mbc.e16-11-0777

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Abel ED, 2001, Nature, 409, 729, 10.1038/35055575 · DOI
  2. Ai D, 2012, J Clin Invest, 122, 1677, 10.1172/JCI61248 · DOI
  3. Ariga M, 2008, J Biol Chem, 283, 10208, 10.1074/jbc.M710604200 · DOI
  4. Atkinson BJ, 2013, Diabetes, 62, 2249, 10.2337/db12-1146 · DOI
  5. Bi L, 2013, J Lipid Res, 54, 2754, 10.1194/jlr.M039347 · DOI
  6. Bogan JS, 2012, Annu Rev Biochem, 81, 507, 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060109-094246 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bogan JS, 2010, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 22, 506, 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.03.012 · DOI
  8. Bonifacino JS, 2006, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 7, 568, 10.1038/nrm1985 · DOI
  9. Burd CG, 2011, Traffic, 12, 948, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01188.x · DOI
  10. Canuel M, 2008, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 366, 724, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.015 · DOI
  11. Charron MJ, 1999, J Biol Chem, 274, 3253, 10.1074/jbc.274.6.3253 · DOI
  12. Coutinho MF, 2012, Mol Genet Metab, 107, 257, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.07.012 · DOI
  13. Esk C, 2010, J Cell Biol, 188, 131, 10.1083/jcb.200908057 · DOI
  14. Foster LJ, 2001, J Biol Chem, 276, 44212, 10.1074/jbc.M102964200 · DOI
  15. Graham TE, 2007, Horm Metab Res, 39, 717, 10.1055/s-2007-985879 · DOI
  16. Hatakeyama H, 2011, Traffic, 12, 1805, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01279.x · DOI
  17. Herman MA, 2012, Nature, 484, 333, 10.1038/nature10986 · DOI
  18. 10.1091/mbc.e12-10-0765 · DOI
  19. Huang S, 2007, Cell Metab, 5, 237, 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.006 · DOI
  20. Kaddai V, 2009, Diabetologia, 52, 932, 10.1007/s00125-009-1273-3 · DOI
  21. Keller MP, 2008, Genome Res, 18, 706, 10.1101/gr.074914.107 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1091/mbc.e11-10-0839 · DOI
  23. Kooner JS, 2011, Nat Genet, 43, 984, 10.1038/ng.921 · DOI
  24. Laemmli UK, 1970, Nature, 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Li J, 2015, J Biol Chem, 290, 11526, 10.1074/jbc.M115.641225 · DOI
  26. Li LV, 2005, Mol Endocrinol, 19, 2145, 10.1210/me.2005-0032 · DOI
  27. Liu LB, 2007, Diabetes, 56, 1977, 10.2337/db06-1100 · DOI
  28. Lucas M, 2016, Cell, 167, 1623–1635 e14, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.056 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ma J, 2014, J Biol Chem, 289, 133, 10.1074/jbc.M113.533240 · DOI
  30. Mari M, 2008, Traffic, 9, 380, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00686.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Minokoshi Y, 2003, J Biol Chem, 278, 33609, 10.1074/jbc.R300019200 · DOI
  32. Morabito MV, 2014, Neurobiol Dis, 65, 188, 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.12.017 · DOI
  33. Sanjana NE, 2014, Nat Methods, 11, 783, 10.1038/nmeth.3047 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Sargeant RJ, 1993, Biochem J, 290, 913, 10.1042/bj2900913 · DOI
  35. Seaman MN, 2004, J Cell Biol, 165, 111, 10.1083/jcb.200312034 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Seaman MN, 2007, J Cell Sci, 120, 2378, 10.1242/jcs.009654 · DOI
  37. Seaman MN, 2012, J Cell Sci, 125, 4693, 10.1242/jcs.103440 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1091/mbc.e02-06-0315 · DOI
  39. Shi J, 2005, Dev Cell, 9, 99, 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.04.004 · DOI
  40. Sivitz WI, 1989, Nature, 340, 72, 10.1038/340072a0 · DOI
  41. Slot SW, 1991, J Cell Biol, 113, 123, 10.1083/jcb.113.1.123 · DOI
  42. Tsuchiya Y, 2010, J Biol Chem, 285, 34371, 10.1074/jbc.M110.128520 · DOI
  43. Vassilopoulos S, 2009, Science, 324, 1192, 10.1126/science.1171529 · DOI
  44. Yang Z, 2016, FASEB J, 30, 1037, 10.1096/fj.15-274704 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pan, X., Zaarur, N., Singh, M., Morin, P., & Kandror, K. V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118
  • Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA 01730
Venue
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Published
2017-06-15
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
1667-1675
ISSN
  • 1059-1524
  • 1939-4586
Cited by
89
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review