The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plato's Ethics
Abstract
This book is an evolution of Plato’s Moral Theory where Irwin presented for the first time his personal interpretation of Plato’s ethics. The aim of this book is to demonstrate that Plato’s rejection of Socrates’ instrumentalism is one of the key elements in the development of Plato’s philosophical perspective. The book, which is structured in 20 chapters, is a dialogue by dialogue commentary, which discusses Plato’s ethics in context of his metaphysics and epistemology. The first chapters study how in his early dialogues (Laches, Charmides, and Euthydemus) Plato interprets Socrates’ method and doctrines. Then, from chapter 6 to 9, it is illustrated how in later dialogues (Gorgias, Meno, Protagoras) Plato tries to defend and support Socrates’ theories against some possible critics. The core of the book (chapters 10 through 18) is devoted to a careful analysis of how Plato in the Republic develops his own views, moving away from the positions of his master. Lastly, in the two final chapters how the mature views of the Republic are advanced in the late dialogues (the Philebus, the Statesman, and the Laws) is examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, K., & Nozick, R. (1975) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/447864 · Cited by 7,692
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers
Taylor, C. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173483 · Cited by 2,372
The Tanner Lectures on Human Values
Pierce, C., & Philosophy Documentation Center (1990) · Idealistic Studies · doi:10.5840/idstudies199020213 · Cited by 2,339
An essay concerning human understanding, 1690.
Locke, J. (1948) · Readings in the history of psychology. · doi:10.1037/11304-008 · Cited by 1,902
Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge
Goldman, A. I. (1976) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2025679 · Cited by 1,870
Long, A. A., & Sedley, D. N. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165907 · Cited by 1,694
Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker.
Hilliard, A. L., Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (1952) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2020651 · Cited by 1,271
(1980) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520340985 · Cited by 1,267
Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle
Dover, K. J. (1975) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/324314 · Cited by 1,173
Cited by
Plato's Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics
Bobonich, C. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199251436.001.0001 · Cited by 308
CRISP, R. (2006) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00551.x · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Irwin, T.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 1995-03-02
- OpenAlex
- W4232448730
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plato's Ethics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0195086457.001.0001
- The paper
- Irwin, T. (1995). Plato's Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195086457.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.