The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Four Illusions: Candrakirti's Advice to Travelers on the Bodhisattva Path
Abstract
Āryadeva's Four Hundred Stanzas (Catuḥśataka) is a Mahāyāna Buddhist text that describes the Bodhisattva's path toward enlightenment. In his commentary on this text, the Indian Buddhist philosopher Candrakiriti (c.550–650 c.e.) combines philosophical argument with the narration of popular stories to persuade beginners on the path of the value of the Buddha's teachings. In the first four chapters, Candrakiriti offers therapeutic advice to lay and monastic people on how to cope with death, suffering, lust, and egotism. Each chapter focuses on a different mistaken idea that must be abandoned by people who aspire to become Buddhas. Candrakiriti argues that people deceive themselves by believing in their immortality, in the pleasurable and pure nature of their bodies, and in the pride they take in themselves and their possessions. Part 1 of Four Illusions explores the broad range of his knowledge about Indian religious beliefs and practices, legal and political works, and the popular literature of his time, the Mahābharata and the Rāmāyaṇa. Part 2 provides the first translation into a Western language of the first four chapters of Candrakiriti commentary on Āryadeva's Four Hundred Stanzas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Candrakīrti dispels the false idea that the body can exist in a pure state.
“Candrak ī rti dispels the false idea that the body can exist in a pure state.”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as Candrakīrti 2003: 180
Candrakīrti comments satirically upon the caste pretensions of Brahmans, born from the filthy womb just like any leather worker or latrine sweeper.
“He comments satirically upon the caste pretensions of Brahmans, born from the filthy womb just like any leather worker or latrine sweeper:”
From Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism (2015) · cites this paper as Candrakīrti 2003: 180
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Medical Analogies in Buddhist and Hellenistic Thought: Tranquillity and Anger
Gowans, C. W. (2010) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246109990221 · Cited by 15
Buddhist Blood Taboo: Mary Douglas, Female Impurity, and Classical Indian Buddhism
Paris Langenberg, A. (2015) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfv059 · Cited by 6
Harter, P. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195393521-0242 · Cited by 1
Lang, K. C. (2021) · The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.1002/9781119009924.eopr0066
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: Bibliography
(2010) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246109990336
Metadata
- Authors
- Candrakirti
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2003-03-20
- OpenAlex
- W4244188395
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- Candrakirti, Mahayana Buddhism, bodhisattva path, Buddhist commentaries, illusion, death, suffering, lust, egotism, self-deception, immortality, Mahabharata, Ramayana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review