The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory
Abstract
Examines which political principles should govern global politics. It explores ethical issues in justice that arise at the global level and addresses questions such as: are there universal values, and if so, what are they; what human rights, if any, are there; are there global principles of distributive justice; should there be a system of supra-state institutions; is national self-determination defensible; when, if ever, may political regimes wage war; and is humanitarian intervention justified? The book outlines and defends an egalitarian liberal brand of cosmopolitanism to address these questions, maintaining that there are universal principles, arguing that these include universal civil and political human rights, and defending the application of global principles of distributive justice. On this basis, it makes a case for a system of supra-state political institutions to promote these universal principles of justice further. Having set out principles of ideal theory, the book then examines what principles should apply when injustices are committed. To do this it examines when political regimes may wage war and when they may engage in intervention, and thereby draws on cosmopolitan principles to derive and defend a cosmopolitan conception of just war and humanitarian intervention. In arriving at these conclusions, the book engages in a sustained analysis of the competing arguments on all the above issues, examining the arguments of nationalists, realists, and those who affirm the ideal of a society of states. To do this, the book explores and integrates the work of philosophers, political theorists, and international relations scholars, and illustrates its ethical argument and theoretical analysis with empirical examples. Furthermore, it argues that the issues examined in the book cannot be adequately treated in isolation from each other but must be treated as an interlinked whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 · Cited by 6,103
Bull, H. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-39340-0 · Cited by 3,316
Bull, H. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9 · Cited by 3,316
Cited by
Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement
Dooley, K., Holz, C., Kartha, S., Klinsky, S., Roberts, J. T., Shue, H., Winkler, H., Athanasiou, T., Caney, S., Cripps, E., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01015-8 · Cited by 162
Self-citationJustice, injustice, and artificial intelligence: Lessons from political theory and philosophy
Rafanelli, L. M. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221080676 · Cited by 44
The Panglossian politics of the geoclique
McKinnon, C. (2020) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216 · Cited by 33
Fry, D. P., & Souillac, G. (2013) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2013.817328 · Cited by 18
The New Ochlophobia?: Populism, Majority Rule, and Prospects for Democratic Republicanism
McCormick, J. P. (2019) · Republicanism and the Future of Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108630153.008 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Caney, S.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2005-01-13
- OpenAlex
- W2479324209
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 47.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/019829350x.001.0001
- The paper
- Caney, S. (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/019829350x.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.