Cited by 33Climate Change and GeoengineeringSpace exploration and regulationEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics

The Panglossian politics of the geoclique

Open access
McKinnon, Catriona·2020·Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

Abstract

Solar radiation management (SRM) – a form of geoengineering – creates a risk of ‘termination shock’. If SRM was to be stopped abruptly then temperatures could rise very rapidly with catastrophic impacts. Two prominent geoengineering researchers have recently argued that the risk of termination shock could be minimised through the adoption of ‘relatively simple’ policies. This paper shows their arguments to be premised on heroically optimistic assumptions about the prospects for global cooperation and sustained trust in an SRM deployment scenario. The paper argues that worst-case scenarios are the right place to start in thinking about the governance of SRM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13698230.2020.1694216

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAI redundancies are likely to be expensive and thus inconsistently implemented.

    “SAI redundancies specifically are likely to be expensive and thus inconsistently implemented (Halstead, 2018; Parker and Irvine, 2018; McKinnon, 2020).”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as McKinnon, 2020

    Section 2 (page unavailable) says a shadow backup infrastructure would at least double deployment costs and that maintaining it would require difficult, sustained cooperation. It does not say that expense would cause SAI redundancies to be implemented inconsistently; the implementation concern it develops is chiefly about cooperation and trust. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Callies D. E., 2019, Ethics, Policy & Environment
  2. Cohen G. A., 2009, Why not socialism?
  3. Hourdequin M., 2019, Ethics, Policy & Environment
  4. McKinnon C., 2018, Environmental.
  5. Shue H., 2015, Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 8, 86
  6. Whyte K. P., 2019, Ethics, Policy & Environment

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKinnon, C.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
McKinnon, Catriona
Venue
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
584-599
ISSN
  • 1369-8230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8772
OpenAlex
W2980615677
Cited by
33
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
solar radiation management, geoengineering, termination shock, geoengineering governance, international cooperation, trust, worst-case scenario, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review