The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics
Abstract
Inequality is becoming an urgent issue of world politics at the end of the twentieth century. Globalization is not only exacerbating the gap between rich and poor in the world, but is also further dividing those states and peoples that have political power and influence from those without. While the powerful shape more ‘global’ rules and norms about investment, military security, and environmental and social policy, the less powerful are becoming ‘rule‐takers’, often of rules or norms that they cannot or will not enforce. The consequences for world politics are profound. The evidence presented in this book suggests that globalization is creating sharper, more urgent problems for states and international institutions to deal with. Yet at the same time, investigations into core areas of world politics suggest that growing inequality is reducing the capacity of governments and existing international organizations to manage these problems effectively. The areas surveyed include: international order, international law, welfare and social policy, global justice, regionalism and multilateralism, environmental protection, gender equality, military power, and security.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-3930 · Cited by 2,653
Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-6572 · Cited by 1,959
Has Globalization Gone Too Far?
Rodrik, D. (1997) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165897 · Cited by 1,725
Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2539147 · Cited by 1,701
Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy
Shue, H. (1980) · Cited by 1,312
Political Theory and International Relations
Suganami, H. (1980) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2617397 · Cited by 1,072
The Expansion of International Society
Campbell, J. C., Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20042191 · Cited by 1,051
(1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598661 · Cited by 1,049
Paterson, M. (1997) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2623562 · Cited by 873
The State, War, and the State of War
Holsti, K. J. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628306 · Cited by 860
Cited by
Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism
Tan, K.-C. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490385 · Cited by 587
Human Rights and Social Work: Towards Rights-Based Practice
(2024) · doi:10.32920/27948843.v1 · Cited by 482
(2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207 · Cited by 461
Globalization, culture, and anxiety: perspectives and predictions from terror management theory
Salzman, M. B. (2001) · Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless · doi:10.1023/a:1011676025600 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 1999-04-08
- OpenAlex
- W1608884402
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 45.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0198295669.001.0001
- The paper
- Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295669.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.