The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness in Comparative Perspective
Abstract
This is the first of a two‐volume study of the adjustment of advanced welfare states to international economic pressures, in which leading scholars detail the wide variety of responses in 12 countries to the challenges to their employment and social policy systems in the period between the first oil‐price crises of the early 1970s and the increasing economic globalization of the 1980s and 1990s. Rejecting any notion of convergence to some kind of neo‐liberal orthodoxy, the authors find that most countries have remained true to the basic features of their post‐war model as they have liberalized their employment and social systems. Moreover, within different welfare‐state constellations, while some countries are still struggling to adjust, others have reached a new sustainable equilibrium. On the basis of in‐depth country studies in Volume II (including the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark), the present volume provides comparative analyses of countries’ economic vulnerabilities and institutional capabilities, of the role of policy learning in effective policy responses, and of the role of values and discourse in the politics of adjustment. While these chapters show that there is no convergence in welfare‐state institutions and that there is no single solution or formula for successful adaptation, they also demonstrate that there are multiple paths towards a successful adjustment of advanced welfare states to international economic pressures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Thelen, K. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 · Cited by 3,409
Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State
Rothstein, B. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598449 · Cited by 1,403
The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00138786 · Cited by 1,346
Cited by
Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123409000672 · Cited by 1,113
Social Traps and the Problem of Trust
Rothstein, B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490323 · Cited by 929
Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies
Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0009 · Cited by 785
Scharpf, F. W. (2002) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00392 · Cited by 783
The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a 'social market economy'
Scharpf, F. W. (2010) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwp031 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2000-11-23
- OpenAlex
- W820042748
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 68.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness in Comparative Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199240884.001.0001
- The paper
- Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness in Comparative Perspective. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199240884.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.