Weighing Lives
Abstract
People are often faced with decisions that involve weighing the lives of some people against the lives of others, or weighing lives against other goods. This book aims to develop a moral theory that can help with making these practical decisions. It is a theory of value, which includes an account of how good it is to extend a person’s life, and also an account of how good it is to have new lives in the world — of the value of adding a new person to the world’s population. It is a theory about the aggregation of people’s wellbeing: of how the wellbeing that comes to a person at different times in her life comes together to determine the overall value of her life, and of how different people’s wellbeing comes together to determine the overall value of the world. The book pays particular attention to the common intuition that adding people to the population is ethically neutral, but eventually rejects it. The book’s conclusion is a version of utilitarianism. The method is formal, but the presentation is as informal as possible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The most important thing about climate change
Broome, J. (2010) · Public Policy: Why ethics matters · doi:10.22459/pp.10.2010.06 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Broome, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Broome, John
- ORCID
- Broome, John
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2004-08-05
- OpenAlex
- W4235997983
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 28.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- moral theory, axiology, population ethics, utilitarianism, ethical decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review