Cited by 511Philosophical Ethics and TheoryPolitical Philosophy and EthicsEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Weighing Lives

Broome, John·2004

Abstract

People are often faced with decisions that involve weighing the lives of some people against the lives of others, or weighing lives against other goods. This book aims to develop a moral theory that can help with making these practical decisions. It is a theory of value, which includes an account of how good it is to extend a person’s life, and also an account of how good it is to have new lives in the world — of the value of adding a new person to the world’s population. It is a theory about the aggregation of people’s wellbeing: of how the wellbeing that comes to a person at different times in her life comes together to determine the overall value of her life, and of how different people’s wellbeing comes together to determine the overall value of the world. The book pays particular attention to the common intuition that adding people to the population is ethically neutral, but eventually rejects it. The book’s conclusion is a version of utilitarianism. The method is formal, but the presentation is as informal as possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/019924376x.001.0001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broome, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Broome, John
Published
2004-08-05
OpenAlex
W4235997983
Cited by
511
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
28.42
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
moral theory, axiology, population ethics, utilitarianism, ethical decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review