The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
Abstract
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond takes a critical tour through recent democratic theory, beginning with the deliberative turn that occurred around 1990. The essence of this turn is that democratic legitimacy is to be found in authentic deliberation among those affected by a collective decision. While the deliberative turn was initially a challenge to established institutions and models of democracy, it was soon assimilated by these same institutions and models. Drawing a distinction between liberal constitutionalism and discursive democracy, the author criticizes the former and advocates the latter. He argues that a defensible theory of democracy should be critical of established power, pluralistic, reflexive in questioning established traditions, transnational in its capacity to extend across state boundaries, ecological, and dynamic in its openness to changing constraints upon, and opportunities for, democratization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408
Fenichel Pitkin, H. (1967) · doi:10.1525/9780520340503 · Cited by 5,162
Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research
Skocpol, T. (1985) · Bringing the State Back In · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628283.002 · Cited by 2,370
The Idea Of An Overlapping Consensus
RAWLS, J. (1987) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/7.1.1 · Cited by 1,075
Cited by
Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse
Schmidt, V. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 · Cited by 3,388
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0101 · Cited by 1,082
Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5275 · Cited by 915
Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051 · Cited by 841
The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks
Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Dryzek, J. S.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2002-01-03
- OpenAlex
- W193272011
- Cited by
- 1,728
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 84.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/019925043x.001.0001
- The paper
- Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. https://doi.org/10.1093/019925043x.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.