The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rules, Reasons, and Norms
Abstract
The essays selected here come in three packages. The first set of essays is concerned with the rule‐following, response‐dependent character of thought; the second, with the many factors to which choice is rationally responsive—and by reference to which choice can be explained—consistently being under the control of such reason‐giving thought; and the third, with the implications of this multiple sensitivity for how best to regulate human institutions with a view to securing a desirable normative order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View
Tuomela, R. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001 · Cited by 840
For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything
Zeki, S., Goodenough, O. R., Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1546 · Cited by 708
The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society
Brennan, G., & Pettit, P. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199246483.001.0001 · Cited by 365
Self-citationJoint Actions and Group Agents
Pettit, P., & Schweikard, D. (2006) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393105284169 · Cited by 295
Self-citationPettit, P. (2004) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00254.x · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettit, P.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2002-10-31
- OpenAlex
- W2478008237
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rules, Reasons, and Norms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199251878.001.0001
- The paper
- Pettit, P. (2002). Rules, Reasons, and Norms. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251878.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
