The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequality and the State
Open accessAbstract
Describes and analyses one of the biggest social changes in Britain since the Second World War: the dramatic widening of the income distribution since the end of the 1970s, the growth of poverty, and the factors that have driven them. Examines how government intervention through social spending and the taxes that pay for it affect this distribution, and why they take the forms they do. Each part of the discussion is set in the context of public attitudes as revealed by the long-running British Social Attitudes survey. Analyses changes in policy since New Labour came to government in the UK in 1997, evidence on their impacts, and the constraints and pressures on future policies. Brings together new analysis carried out by the author and colleagues at the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics. Includes material on income dynamics, the relationship between public and private welfare provision and finance, the distributional effect of government spending, public attitudes to inequality and social security, and the impact of recent reforms. Covers topics that are often analysed separately, such as income distribution, social spending, and taxation, but which are best understood together. Concludes with a discussion of the dilemmas facing policy-makers as they try to meet competing aims in terms of reducing poverty and inequality, growing demands on social spending, and the constraints and opportunities created by public attitudes. There are few easy ways out, but better public understanding of precisely that may be one of the crucial ingredients of any resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The New Politics of the Welfare State
(2001) · doi:10.1093/0198297564.001.0001 · Cited by 3,228
Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living
Townsend, P. (1979) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520325760 · Cited by 3,160
Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State
Rothstein, B. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598449 · Cited by 1,403
Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion
Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199253498.001.0001 · Cited by 1,133
Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens
Le Grand, J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199266999.001.0001 · Cited by 922
The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Dirven, H.-J. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490927 · Cited by 743
The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State
Barr, N. (2001) · doi:10.1093/0199246599.001.0001 · Cited by 517
Resources, Deprivation, And Poverty
Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198287858.001.0001 · Cited by 446
Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK, 1971- 86
Jenkins, S. P. (1995) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2554775 · Cited by 420
Cross‐country Inequality Trends
Acemoglu, D. (2003) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00100 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Choice and Values: Individualised Rational Action and Social Goals
TAYLOR-GOOBY, P. (2008) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279407001699 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Hills, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2004-10-28
- OpenAlex
- W1511310259
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 47.90
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequality and the State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199276641.001.0001
- The paper
- Hills, J. (2004). Inequality and the State. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199276641.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.