The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers
Abstract
This book is collection of the the author’s previously published papers on the philosophy of modality and tense and it also includes three unpublished papers. The author provides an exposition and defence of certain positions for which he is well-known: the intelligibility of modality de re; the primitiveness of the modal; and the primacy of the actual over the possible. He also argues for some less familiar positions: the existence of distinctive forms of natural and normative necessity, not reducible to any form of metaphysical necessity; the need to make a distinction between the worldly and unworldly, analogous to the distinction between the tensed and the tenseless; and the viability of a nonstandard form of realism about tense, which recognizes the tensed character of reality without conceding there is any privileged standpoint from which it is to be viewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, D. (1979) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184843 · Cited by 1,941
Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics
Brink, D. O. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624612 · Cited by 1,926
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic
Kripke, S. A. (2012) · Universal Logic: An Anthology · doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0145-0_16 · Cited by 1,585
Prior, A. (1967) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198243113.001.0001 · Cited by 1,484
From metaphysics to ethics: a defence of conceptual analysis
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3262 · Cited by 1,469
Armstrong, D. M. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171700 · Cited by 1,415
Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture
Fine, K. (1994) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2214160 · Cited by 1,383
Self-citationAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist
Synge, J. L. (1950) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1950.11776081 · Cited by 1,349
MCTAGGART, J. E. (1908) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/xvii.4.457 · Cited by 943
Simons, P. M., & Rodopi, E. (1981) · Grazer Philosophische Studien · doi:10.5840/gps19811411 · Cited by 927
Metadata
- Authors
- Fine, K.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2005-07-14
- OpenAlex
- W4205450062
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/0199278709.001.0001
- The paper
- Fine, K. (2005). Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199278709.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.