The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changing Referents: Learning Across Space and Time in China and the West
Abstract
Even as globalization has exposed the Eurocentric character of the academic theories used to understand the world, most scholarship continues to rely on the same parochial vocabulary it critiques. Against those who insist our thinking cannot escape the dominant terms of Euro-American modernity, this book shows how methods for understanding cultural others can take theoretical guidance from those very bodies of thought typically excluded by political and social theory. Examining a Chinese conversation over “Western Learning” from the 1860s to the 1920s, the book argues that we might follow these Chinese thinkers in viewing foreign knowledge as a theoretical resource—as a body of knowledge that formulates methods of argument, goals of inquiry, and criteria of evidence that may be generalizable to other places and times. The call of reformers such as Liang Qichao and Yan Fu to bianfa—literally “change the institutions” of Chinese society and politics in order to produce new kinds of Western knowledge—was simultaneously also a call to “change the referents” those institutions sought to emulate, and from which participants might draw their self-understanding. They show that the institutional and cultural contexts supporting the production of knowledge are not prefigured givens that constrain cross-cultural understanding but dynamic platforms for learning that are tractable to concerted efforts over time to transform them. These thinkers point us beyond acknowledgment of cultural difference toward reform of the social, institutional, and disciplinary spaces in which the production of knowledge takes place.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The complete account of how the fi rst denizens of this planet initially required no sustenance, but that in time this primal state of bliss wore o ff , is quite lengthy, taking us through several stages of deterioration.”
From A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought (2018) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“Since there was no one to settle such fi ghting, the people conferred and selected an impartial judge-king … the fi rst king was known as the people ' s lord. Ruling the country by means of laws based on the ten virtues of Buddhism, he was beloved by his subjects. Peace and prosperity prevailed. 31”
From A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought (2018) · cites this paper as [31]
In the citing paper
“The standard Buddhist narrative of the origins of kingship is fairly well known, though it exists in many versions.”
From A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought (2018) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sherwin, D. (2022) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-021-00486-w · Cited by 10
A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought
Barrett, T. H. (2018) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenco, L.
- Corresponding author
- Jenco, Leigh
- ORCID
- Jenco, Leigh
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2015-11-01
- OpenAlex
- W4256462731
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Studies and Colonialism
- Keywords
- Western learning, Liang Qichao, Yan Fu, Eurocentrism, intercultural knowledge, foreign knowledge, institutional reform, Chinese intellectual history, knowledge production, cultural differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing Referents: Learning Across Space and Time in China and the West. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190263812.001.0001
- The paper
- Jenco, L. (2015). Changing Referents: Learning Across Space and Time in China and the West. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780190263812.001.0001