CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Decolonial Thought and EpistemologiesPolitical Philosophy and EthicsIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative political theory, indigenous resurgence, and epistemic justice: From deparochialization to treaty

Sherwin, Daniel·2022·Contemporary Political Theory
DOI 10.1057/s41296-021-00486-w
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41296-021-00486-w

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Settler theorists' political and intellectual lineages have long and deep entanglements with settler colonialism that continue in the present.

    “Our political and intellectual lineages have long and deep entanglements with settler colonialism that continue in the present.”

    From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Sherwin, 2022

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Borrows, J. (2010b) Drawing out law: A spirit’s guide. University of Toronto Press.
  2. Canada Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. (1996) Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Vol. 1, Looking forward, looking back. Ottawa, Ont: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
  3. Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
  4. Elders, T. 7, Carter, S., & Hildebrant, W. (1995) True spirit and original intent of treaty 7. McGill-Queen’s Press - MQUP.
  5. Jenco, L. (2017a) Are certain knowledge frameworks more congenial to the aims of cross-cultural philosophy? A qualified yes. Journal of World Philosophies, 2(2): 113–121.
  6. Jenco, L. (2017b) Global knowledge frameworks and the tasks of cross-cultural philosophy. Journal of World Philosophies, 2(2): 81–86.
  7. Kim, D. H. (2017) Toward more harmonized methodologies in comparative philosophy: A reply to Leigh Jenco. Journal of World Philosophies, 2(2): 91–97.
  8. Mills, A. (2017) What is a treaty? On contract and mutual aid. In J. Borrows & M. Coyle (Eds.), The right relationship: Reimagining the implementation of historical treaties. (p. 440). University of Toronto Press.
  9. Simpson, L. (2011) Dancing on our turtle’s back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Arbeiter Ring Publishing.
  10. Stark, H. (2017) Changing the treaty question: Remedying the right(s) relationship. In J. Borrows & M. Coyle (Eds.), The right relationship: Reimagining the implementation of historical treaties. (pp. 248–276). University of Toronto Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Sherwin, D.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Sherwin, Daniel
ORCID
Sherwin, Daniel
Venue
Contemporary Political Theory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-04-19
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
46-70
ISSN
  • 1470-8914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9336
DOI
10.1057/s41296-021-00486-w
OpenAlex
W3155545151
Cited by
10
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Contemporary Political Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
comparative political thought, Indigenous resurgence, epistemic justice, indigenous political thought, Indigenous sovereignty, self-determination (international law), knowledge extraction, refusal, reflexivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review