The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology
Abstract
Why are some countries better than others at science and technology (S&T)? Written in an approachable style, The Politics of Innovation provides readers from all backgrounds and levels of expertise with a comprehensive introduction to the debates over national S&T competitiveness. It synthesizes over fifty years of theory and research on national innovation rates, bringing together the current political and economic wisdom and latest findings about how nations become S&T leaders. Many experts mistakenly believe that domestic institutions and policies determine national innovation rates. However, after decades of research, there is still no agreement on precisely how this happens and exactly which institutions matter, and little aggregate evidence has been produced to support any particular explanation. Yet, despite these problems, a core faith in the relationship between domestic institutions and national innovation rates remains widely held and little challenged. This book confronts head-on this contradiction between theory, evidence, and the popularity of the institutions-innovation hypothesis. It presents extensive evidence to show that domestic institutions and policies do not determine innovation rates. Instead, it argues that networks are perhaps more important than institutions in determining national innovation rates. The Politics of Innovation also introduces a new theory of “creative insecurity,” which explains how institutions, policies, and networks are all subservient to politics. Ultimately, each country’s balance of domestic rivalries versus external threats, and the ensuing political fights, is what drives S&T competitiveness. All told, The Politics of Innovation draws upon statistical analysis and comparative case studies of dozens of countries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In cases where impacts of public sector performance are difficult to measure, the feedback on new technologies depends heavily on stake-holders' value-based perceptions (e.g., seeing individual or collective gains; Taylor 2016) as well as on political, ideological or cognitive frameworks that these stakeholders apply when confronting or applying technologies (Orlikowski 1992).”
From Technological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia (2018) · cites this paper as Taylor 2016
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Illusions of techno-nationalism.
Luo, Y. (2022) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00468-5 · Cited by 257
“For instance, attracting top-notch foreign students and scholars and encouraging them to stay and work within the US’s leadingedge fields in science, engineering, and others has significantly contributed to the country’s competitiveness for a century (Ostry & Nelson, 1995; Taylor, 2016).”
BackgroundTechnological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tõnurist, P. (2018) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852317735164 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, M. Z.
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Mark Zachary
- ORCID
- Taylor, Mark Zachary
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2016-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W4254983913
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Twentieth Century Scientific Developments
- Keywords
- science and technology competitiveness, innovation networks, politics of innovation, external threats, science policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190464127.001.0001
- The paper
- Taylor, M. Z. (2016). The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780190464127.001.0001