Creating Interdisciplinary Research Teams and Using Consultants
Abstract
Abstract This chapter addresses the need to organize collaborative research by gathering and using the collaboration of experts, mentors, and consultants. It also details how to move into the mentor/consultant role as one's experience grows. The use of investigators from multiple disciplines, moving towards translational forms, and bridging scientific disciplines will maximize the likelihood that research findings will be used. The different forms of complex teams, their creation, expertise areas, and sustainment are discussed. The chapter closes by detailing the use of consultants, their pay, rights, and selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grant applications that convey the team's experience with the study setting, the treatment whose implementation is being studied, and implementation processes help convey capacity and feasibility to complete an implementation research project.
“Grant applications that convey the team’s experience with the study setting, the treatment whose implementation is being studied, and implementation processes help convey capacity and feasibility to complete an implementation research project [108].”
From Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients (2012) · cites this paper as [108]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., Baumann, A. A., Hamilton, A. M., & Santens, R. L. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
- Authors
- Landsverk, J.
- Corresponding author
- Landsverk, John
- Venue
- The Field Research Survival Guide
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-04-30
- Pages
- 127-145
- OpenAlex
- W2495395518
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- interdisciplinary research teams, research collaboration, consultants, mentoring, translational research, team formation, consultant selection, research team leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
