The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Linji Lu and the Creation of Chan Orthodoxy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“given that Du Fei was writing during a time when Daoists and Buddhists were fiercely at odds with one another, it is hard to imagine that Du Fei was casually tossing off an ill-considered analogy here 48 .”
From Early Chan Buddhism: A Meditation Movement or New Ways of Writing about Final Authority in Tang China? (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is Mindfulness Buddhist? (and Why It Matters)
Sharf, R. H. (2015) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461514557561 · Cited by 226
Cole, A. R. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel15040403 · Cited by 3
Keyworth, G. (2020) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2020.1763675 · Cited by 1
Jones, R. J. (2012) · Ming Studies · doi:10.1179/0147037x12z.0000000007
Keyworth, G. A. (2019) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2019.1686872
Metadata
- Authors
- Welter, A.
- Corresponding author
- Welter, Albert
- ORCID
- Welter, Albert
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-02-28
- OpenAlex
- W2486204676
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Linji school, Zen Buddhism, Chinese Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
