The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Torture and Moral Integrity: A Philosophical Enquiry
Abstract
Torture and Moral Integrity is about the wrongness of torture and about the nature of morality. It lengthily discusses multiple types of torture with great philosophical acuity, and it seeks to explain why interrogational torture and other types of torture are always and everywhere morally wrong. At the same time, it rigorously plumbs the general structure of morality and the intricacies of moral conflicts, and it probes some of the chief grounds for the moral illegitimacy of various modes of conduct. It sophisticatedly defends a deontological conception of morality against some subtle critiques that have been mounted during the past few decades by proponents of consequentialism. The book tackles a concrete moral problem–a problem heatedly debated during recent years in the governmental and military institutions of many countries as well as in academic circles–and it likewise tackles some very abstract issues in moral and political philosophy. Moreover, as becomes apparent at numerous junctures, the abstract ruminations and the concrete prescriptions are closely connected. For example, the author's recommendations concerning the legal consequences of the perpetration of torture by public officials or private individuals are based squarely on his more abstract accounts of the nature of torture and the nature of morality. His philosophical reflections on the structure of morality are the vital background for his approach to torture, and his approach to torture is a natural outg…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Kramer argues that interrogational torture may be weakly morally justified under extremely particular circumstances, such as the ticking time bomb (Kramer 2014, 212).”
From Vigilantism in Moral Philosophy (2017) · cites this paper as Kramer 2014, 212
In the citing paper
“He argues that the accountability factor can balance out the psychological harms to the victim and perpetrator of interrogational torture, by affirming the victim's status and by making the perpetrator face the consequences of their actions.”
From Vigilantism in Moral Philosophy (2017) · cites this paper as Kramer 2014
In the citing paper
“In his book Torture and Moral Integrity, Matthew Kramer suggests that moral permissibility should be sub-divided into strongly morally justified actions and weakly morally justified actions (Kramer 2014, 5).”
From Vigilantism in Moral Philosophy (2017) · cites this paper as Kramer 2014, 5
In the citing paper
“Like torturers, perpetrators of vigilantism display a kind of god-like arrogance, which is extremely disturbing and problematic within a civil society (Kramer 2014, 191).”
From Vigilantism in Moral Philosophy (2017) · cites this paper as Kramer 2014, 191
In the citing paper
“As argued by Matthew Kramer, there are damaging psychological effects to acting above the law without consequences.”
From Vigilantism in Moral Philosophy (2017) · cites this paper as Kramer 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vigilantism in Moral Philosophy
Ahmad, S. (2017) · McMaster University · doi:10.71548/25216
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramer, M. H.
- Corresponding author
- Kramer, Matthew H.
- ORCID
- Kramer, Matthew H.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-04-07
- OpenAlex
- W4253291747
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
- Keywords
- torture, moral integrity, deontology, consequentialism, moral conflict
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Torture and Moral Integrity: A Philosophical Enquiry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714200.001.0001
- The paper
- Kramer, M. H. (2014). Torture and Moral Integrity: A Philosophical Enquiry. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198714200.001.0001
