Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 121Language, Metaphor, and CognitionLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsPoetry Analysis and Criticism

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and Others

Silk, Michael·2003·Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition

Abstract

This chapter argues in favour of Roman Jakobson’s privileging of metonymy alongside metaphor as primary linguistic tropes (‘trope’ is to be understood here, in a significant modification of Aristotle’s understanding of metaphor, as deviation from usage perceived or felt as normal). But Jakobson shares with Aristotle, as also with Paul Ricoeur and philosophical theorists at large, the fault of paying too little respect to actual literary practice. The result is that they identify metaphor as the defining characteristic of poetic language, mistakenly ignoring the importance of metonymy as well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199240050.003.0007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Silk, M.
Corresponding author
Silk, Michael
Venue
Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition
Published
2003-03-20
Pages
115-148
OpenAlex
W2473650894
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 12 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Keywords
metaphor, metonymy, Roman Jakobson, Aristotle, Paul Ricoeur, poetic language, literary practice, poetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and Others. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199240050.003.0007
The paper
Silk, M. (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur, and Others. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199240050.003.0007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.