The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Challenging Climate Change
Abstract
An organized campaign to deny the reality and significance of climate change has worked to undermine the claims of the scientific community and block efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This chapter outlines the historical and cultural conditions that have provided fertile soil for climate change denial’s emergence (most notably, the rise of neoliberalism as hegemonic ideology). It explains the denial countermovement’s strategies of manufacturing uncertainty and controversy, which substitute ideology for science and put our societal resilience at stake. The chapter describes the key components of the U.S. countermovement: the fossil fuels industry and corporate America; conservative think tanks and foundations; contrarian scientists; front groups and “Astroturf” campaigns; conservative politicians; and conservative media and the denial blogosphere. The chapter also documents the international diffusion of climate change denial, indicating that the countermovement is evolving into a global force designed to combat the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and international climate advocacy network.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misinformation campaigns generate confusion and controversy around climate change.
“In addition, there are misinformation campaigns that generate confusion and controversy around the issue (Dunlap and McCright, 2015), which may thwart environmental action.”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy as an approach for working with climate distress (2024) · cites this paper as Dunlap and McCright, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marlow, T., Miller, S., & Roberts, J. T. (2021) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1870098 · Cited by 64
Acceptance and commitment therapy as an approach for working with climate distress
Williams, M. O., & Samuel, V. M. (2024) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x23000247 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M.
- Venue
- Climate Change and Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Pages
- 300-332
- OpenAlex
- W2491108917
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 94.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- climate change denial, countermovement, neoliberalism, science and ideology, production uncertainty, greenhouse gas emissions, fossil fuel industry, conservative think tanks, front groups, astroturfing, conservative media, IPCC
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review