The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolutionary Social Constructivism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A good example is the intellectual tradition of social constructivism, which has long appeared to be opposed to evolutionary accounts of human nature (Segerstrale 2001; Wilson 2005; 2009).”
From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Wilson 2009
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001593 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, D. S.
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, David Sloan
- ORCID
- Wilson, David Sloan
- Venue
- The Believing Primate
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2009-03-12
- Pages
- 318-338
- OpenAlex
- W2486113066
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 59.65
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- social construction of reality, evolutionary theory, social evolution, cultural evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
