The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Islamic Law in ActionAuthority, Discretion, and Everyday Experiences in Mamluk Egypt
Abstract
A dynamic account of the practice of Islamic law, this book focuses on the actions of a particular legal official, the muhtasib, whose vast jurisdiction included all public behavior. In the cities of Cairo and neighboring Fustat during the Mamluk period (1250-1517), the men who held the position of muhtasib acted as regulators of markets and public spaces generally. They traversed their jurisdictions carrying out the duty to command right and forbid wrong, and were as much a part of the legal landscape as the better-known figures of judge and mufti. Taking directions from the rulers, the sultan foremost among them, they were also guided by legal doctrine as formulated by the jurists, combining these two sources of law in one face of authority. The daily workings of the law are illuminated by the reports of the muhtasib in the vivid Mamluk-era chronicles, which often also captured the responses of the individuals who encountered the official. The book is organized around actions taken by the muhtasib in the areas of Muslim devotional and pious practices; crimes and offenses; the management of Christians and Jews; market regulation and consumer protection; the specific markets for essential bread; currency and taxes; and public order. The case studies presented show that while legal doctrine was clearly relevant to the muhtasib’s actions, the policy demands of the sultan were also quite significant, and rules from both sources of authority intersected with social, political, economic, and personal factors to create full and vibrant scenarios that reveal the practice of Islamic law.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in the many areas of public, social, and economic life where Islamic religious rules are either nonexistent or prohibitively restrictive, Muslim authorities are permitted to act within broad moral constraints as long as their actions are justifiable as advancing communal welfare (maslaha) (Stilt 2012).”
From Political Islam: Theory (2015) · cites this paper as Stilt 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
March, A. F. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-082112-141250 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Stilt, K.
- Corresponding author
- Stilt, Kristen
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-01-12
- OpenAlex
- W265752391
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Ottoman Empire History and Society
- Keywords
- Islamic law, muhtasib, Mamluk Egypt, Fustat, Cairo, market regulation, public order, religious authority, legal doctrine, religious devotion, consumer protection, bread market, Mamluk chronicles, legal officials, everyday law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Islamic Law in ActionAuthority, Discretion, and Everyday Experiences in Mamluk Egypt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602438.001.0001
- The paper
- Stilt, K. (2012). Islamic Law in ActionAuthority, Discretion, and Everyday Experiences in Mamluk Egypt. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199602438.001.0001