The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods: Second Edition
Abstract
This excellent text provides a comprehensive treatment of the state space approach to time series analysis. The distinguishing feature of state space time series models is that observations are regarded as made up of distinct components such as trend, seasonal, regression elements and disturbence [sic] terms, each of which is modelled separately. The techniques that emerge from this approach are very flexible and are capable of handling a much wider range of problems than the main analytical system currently in use for time series analysis, the Box-Jenkins ARIMA system. The book provides an excellent source for the development of practical courses on time series analysis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The theoretical status of latent variables.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.203 · Cited by 1,566
Riemann manifold langevin and hamiltonian monte carlo methods
Girolami, M., & Calderhead, B. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · Cited by 1,473
A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets
Tittensor, D. P., Walpole, M., Hill, S. L. L., Boyce, D. G., Britten, G. L., Burgess, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Leadley, P. W., Regan, E. C., Alkemade, R., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257484 · Cited by 1,227
Global alcohol exposure between 1990 and 2017 and forecasts until 2030: a modelling study
Manthey, J., Shield, K. D., Rylett, M., Hasan, O. S. M., Probst, C., & Rehm, J. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32744-2 · Cited by 856
Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1446819 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Durbin, J., & Koopman, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Tinbergen Institute (NL)
- ORCID
- Koopman, Siem Jan
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-05-03
- Pages
- 253
- OpenAlex
- W2147269409
- Cited by
- 3,301
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 167 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 181 · 2023: 183 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 206 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 172 · 2015: 166 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 119
- FWCI
- 67.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Keywords
- state-space model, time series analysis, trend component, seasonal component, time series forecasting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
