Cited by 707Philosophical Ethics and TheoryCritical Realism in SociologyFree Will and Agency

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together

Bratman, Michael E.·2014·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Human beings act together in characteristic ways that matter to us a great deal. This book explores the conceptual, metaphysical and normative foundations of such sociality. It argues that appeal to the planning structures involved in our individual, temporally extended agency provides substantial resources for understanding these foundations of our sociality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 707

Metadata

Authors
Bratman, M. E.
Corresponding author
Bratman, Michael E.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2014-01-21
OpenAlex
W4238828868
Cited by
707
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 5
FWCI
42.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
shared agency, sociality, planning, metaphysics of action, collective action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review