The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science
Abstract
Abstract This book makes the contemporary philosophical literature on science and values accessible to a wide readership. It focuses on two questions: What are the major ways in which scientific reasoning can be influenced by values? and How can we tell whether those influences are appropriate or not? To address these questions, it examines case studies from a variety of research areas, including climate science, anthropology, chemical risk assessment, ecology, neurobiology, biomedical research, and agriculture. These cases show that the value-free ideal for science is problematic; values have important roles to play in identifying research topics, choosing research questions, determining the aims of inquiry, responding to uncertainty, and deciding how to communicate information. The book argues that values can influence science in these ways without harming scientific objectivity—in fact, making value judgments more explicit actually promotes objectivity. In place of the value-free ideal, the scientific community should strive to meet three conditions for addressing values appropriately: (1) the influences of values should be made transparent; (2) values should reflect ethical and social priorities; and (3) values should be scrutinized via processes of engagement that incorporate multiple stakeholders. The book explores multiple engagement strategies that can help bring values to light and subject them to critical scrutiny.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bias mostly occurs unintentionally (i.e., subconsciously); for example, when a scientist underpowers a study or is not aware of sexist assumptions that underpin their interpretive framework [48–52].”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Most scientific research done by humans stems from personal, social, political, or economic values that drive inquiry [33, 50, 105].”
From Autonomous artificial intelligence, scientific research, and human values (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 342
Intelligence and scientific expertise
Barrotta, P., & Gronda, R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03513-4 · Cited by 3
Fact‐value framework for adjudicating public health policy debates
Choi, Y., & FOX, A. M. (2022) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12495 · Cited by 3
Diggin, S. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03808-6 · Cited by 3
Engaging with Science, Values, and Society: Introduction
Brigandt, I. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2022.37 · Cited by 3
A whale of a time: engaging in a war of values for youth activism in science education
Gisewhite, R. A. (2023) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-022-10140-5 · Cited by 3
Earning epistemic trustworthiness: an impact assessment model
Rolin, K. H. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04472-0 · Cited by 4
Hilligardt, H. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00607-3 · Cited by 3
Values in climate modelling: testing the practical applicability of the Moral Imagination ideal
Pulkkinen, K., Undorf, S., & Bender, F. A. ‐. (2022) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-022-00488-4 · Cited by 3
Cultural studies in science education: A philosophical appraisal
Matthews, M. R. (2023) · Cultures of Science · doi:10.1177/20966083231173721 · Cited by 5
Has There Been a Second Kuhnian Transformation in the Philosophical Image of Science?
Rouse, J. (2024) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64229-6_2 · Cited by 2
Assessing Knowledge Claims in Scientific Controversies: On the Origins of COVID-19
Panagiotou, A. (2025) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00636 · Cited by 2
The WHO and the ‘whose values?’ problem: on the partial democratisation of science
Cairns, M. (2025) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-025-00675-z · Cited by 4
What is meta-analysis good for?
Kovaka, K. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02450-5 · Cited by 2
ChoGlueck, C. (2022) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2022.11 · Cited by 3
Critical perspectives on science: Arguments for a richer discussion on the scientific enterprise
Toescu, E. C., & Tuboly, Á. T. (2023) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2023.2193072 · Cited by 2
An update on allegations of invasive species denialism
Linklater, W. L., Steer, J., & Munro, D. (2023) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.14223 · Cited by 2
Words Matter: Reflective Science Communication and Tradeoffs in Environmental Health Research
Elliott, K. C., Patisaul, H. B., Sargis, R. M., & Vandenberg, L. N. (2024) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp14527 · Cited by 3
Self-citationValue-aware nutrition science: building credibility through reflexivity
Penders, B., Bordoni, A., Daniel, H., Larqué, E., Laitinen, K., Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A., & WG2, F. (2025) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-025-03699-6 · Cited by 3
Cram, F., Cannell, H., & Gulliver, P. J. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211042565 · Cited by 2
Introduction to values and pluralism in the environmental sciences: From inferences to institutions
Piso, Z., & Pâslaru, V. (2021) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.09.011 · Cited by 2
Nash, E. J. (2023) · Australasian Philosophical Review · doi:10.1080/24740500.2023.2441509 · Cited by 2
Nagel on the Methodology of the Social Sciences
Neuber, M. (2021) · Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81010-8_11 · Cited by 2
Agnotologia e o Princípio da Precaução
de Souza, P. B. (2021) · Principia an international journal of epistemology · doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80461 · Cited by 2
Procedural influences on scientific advisory work: the case of chemical hazard characterization
Maxim, L. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1407299 · Cited by 2
The epistemic status of reproducibility in political fact-checking
Fernández-Roldán, A., & Teira, D. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00575-8 · Cited by 2
Jalloh, M. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04567-2 · Cited by 1
Unleash the power of values: how to conduct better science and cultivate thriving research groups
Schoenle, L. A., O’Brien, C., Brousseau, J. J., & Wendler, A. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-024-00985-3 · Cited by 1
Epistemic niche construction and non-epistemic values: the case of 19th century craniology
Benedetto, M. D., & Luchetti, M. (2025) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-025-00648-2 · Cited by 1
SENS vs. the hallmarks of aging: competing visions, shared challenges
García‐Barranquero, P., & Pérez‐González, S. (2025) · Biogerontology · doi:10.1007/s10522-025-10248-5 · Cited by 1
No Interest: The Marginalization of Women in Academic Finance
Fine, C., Yadav, N., & Murawski, C. (2025) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545701.2025.2483823 · Cited by 1
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197815281.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Alleviating Epistemic Injustice in Environmental Health Research: Strategies from Science and Values
Elliott, K. C. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10268-3 · Cited by 1
Self-citationJustifying the epistemic authority of science in liberal democracy
Varga, S., Steglich‐Petersen, A., & Kappel, K. (2025) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-025-00703-y · Cited by 1
Science-based policymaking: the need to think holistically, realistically, and institutionally
Kurtulmuş, F. (2026) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-026-00721-4 · Cited by 2
Geography and Environmental Governance I: Governing with Environmental Data
Tadaki, M. (2026) · Progress in Environmental Geography · doi:10.1177/27539687261435580 · Cited by 1
Embracing conflict: an agonistic groundwork for the legitimation of non-epistemic values in science
Bobadilla, H. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05543-8 · Cited by 1
A defence of informed preference-based approaches to welfare evaluations in public policy
Fumagalli, R. (2026) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2026.2686639 · Cited by 1
Public perceptions of federal science advisory boards depend on their composition
Otten, C. D., Gray, S. G., Raimi, K. T., Wilson, R. S., & Árvai, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2012571117 · Cited by 1
Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study
Smith, E. M. R., Rakestraw, C., & Farroni, J. S. (2022) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2130058 · Cited by 1
BOUWEL, J. V. (2023) · OEconomia · doi:10.4000/oeconomia.14555 · Cited by 1
Revising the Keystone Species Concept for Conservation: Value Neutrality and Non-Nativeness
Halm, D. (2024) · Ethics Policy & Environment · doi:10.1080/21550085.2024.2389008 · Cited by 1
How Uncertainty Interacts with Ethical Values in Climate Change Research
Helgeson, C., Parker, W. S., & Tuana, N. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-85542-9_22 · Cited by 1
Seepage, objectivity, and climate science
O’Loughlin, R. (2019) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.07.002 · Cited by 1
Bardapurkar, A. (2020) · Resonance · doi:10.1007/s12045-020-1059-y · Cited by 1
Communication, Education and the Problem of Trust
Thompson, P. B. (2020) · The international library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics/The International library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61214-6_12 · Cited by 1
Inductive risk in macroeconomics: Natural Rate Theory, monetary policy, and the Great Canadian Slump
Contessa, G. (2020) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267120000383 · Cited by 1
Precautionary Reasoning and the Precautionary Principle
Resnik, D. B. (2021) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70791-0_5 · Cited by 1
Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2019
Luzzini, F. (2019) · Isis · doi:10.1086/707594 · Cited by 1
Un acercamiento filosófico a los fundamentos de las ciencias sociales
Peña, G. R. F. (2021) · doi:10.29105/aitias1.2-6 · Cited by 1
Reply to Calow: In defense of science and its inclusion in decision making
Apitz, S. E., Backhaus, T., Chapman, P. M., Landis, W. G., & Suter, G. W. (2017) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.1959
A Framework for Understanding Wishful Thinking
Hicks, D., & Elliott, K. C. (2018) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Self-citationThe Future of Adverse Outcome Pathways: Analyzing their Social Context
Elliott, K. C., Murphy, C. A., & García‐Reyero, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66084-4_19
Self-citationWojciechowski, J. (2016) · Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne · doi:10.36702/zin.296
Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci (eds.): Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism
Radder, H. (2019) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-019-09456-8
BOUWEL, J. V. (2019) · Ethiek en Maatschappij · doi:10.21825/em.94628
Can Agrifood Biotechnology Help the Poor?
Thompson, P. B. (2020) · The international library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics/The International library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61214-6_9
Precautionary Reasoning and Decision Theory
Resnik, D. B. (2021) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70791-0_2
Idealism of Cultural Studies and Realism of Mario Bunge
Matthews, M. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0558-1_9
Thorén, H. (2021) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65273-9_8
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.005
When public health goes wrong : the history and ethics of public health errors
Bavli, I. (2021) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0401969
Values and Persons: The Persistent Problem of Values in Science and Psychology
Osbeck, L. M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_87-1
Caporali, F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76683-2_2
Values and Persons: The Persistent Problem of Values in Science and Psychology
Osbeck, L. M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7255-2_87
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.003
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.004
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.001
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.007
Values: Stretching and Embracing the Unembraceable
Saduov, R. (2022) · Intercultural Relations · doi:10.12797/rm.02.2022.12.03
Socio-Markers and Information Transmission
Federica Russo, B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28432-8_3
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.002
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.009
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.008
Pavličić, J. (2023) · Theoria Beograd · doi:10.2298/theo2304033p
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302.006
Green, F. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0354.13
“Everyone has interests”: A red herring
Öberg, G., & Scheringer, M. (2024) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.4938
Value Conflicts as Value Indicators
Neemre, E. (2024) · Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum · doi:10.11590/abhps.2024.1.04
Managing values in climate science
Roussos, J. (2024) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000432
Decision Making, Values and (Dis)Trust in Science: Two Cases from Public Health
Popa, E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68058-8_11
Vittersø, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69292-5_1 · Cited by 1
Schmaling, K. B., & Kaplan, R. M. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009391733.007
Schmaling, K. B., & Kaplan, R. M. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009391733.006
Kenneth Boulding and James Buchanan on the public function of economics
Dekker, E. (2025) · The Review of Austrian Economics · doi:10.1007/s11138-025-00677-3
Trust in Scientific Expertise and the Varying Demands of Value Transparency
Metzen, H. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2025.10004 · Cited by 1
Lalumera, E. (2025) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90414-1_4
A Novel Type of Precautionary Argument for Situations of Severe Uncertainty in Science and Policy
Fumagalli, R. (2025) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/00483931251346001
The Epistemic Aims of the Humanities
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0003
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0002
Philosophy of the Humanities: What and Why?
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0001
Authority and Deference in the Humanities
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0004
The Future of the Philosophy of the Humanities
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0010
Perspectives, Social Constructions, Standpoints, and Truth in the Humanities
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0006
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0008
Method and Interpretation in the Humanities
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0005
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0009
The Humanities and Political Aims
Grimm, S. R., Peels, R., & van Woudenberg, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197749647.003.0007
El nuevo problema de la demarcación: el criterio axiológico y los valores no epistémicos correctos
Aramendi, I. R. (2025) · Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) · doi:10.5209/resf.99082
Trade-offs and Progress in Cancer Science
Plutynski, A. (2025) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88213-5_13
Science, Values, and Action Guidance: Can we Stop Talking about the Value Free Ideal?
Lusk, G. (2025) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92958-8_15
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, K. C.
- Corresponding author
- Elliott, Kevin C.
- ORCID
- Elliott, Kevin C.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2017-02-03
- OpenAlex
- W2577177528
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 26.51
- Type
- book
- Language
- fi
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Keywords
- values in science, value-free ideal, scientific objectivity, stakeholder engagement, science and ethics, climate science, chemical risk assessment, biomedical research, science communication, scientific uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
