CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 343Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationLogic and Philosophy of Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science

Elliott, Kevin C.·2017·Oxford University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This book makes the contemporary philosophical literature on science and values accessible to a wide readership. It focuses on two questions: What are the major ways in which scientific reasoning can be influenced by values? and How can we tell whether those influences are appropriate or not? To address these questions, it examines case studies from a variety of research areas, including climate science, anthropology, chemical risk assessment, ecology, neurobiology, biomedical research, and agriculture. These cases show that the value-free ideal for science is problematic; values have important roles to play in identifying research topics, choosing research questions, determining the aims of inquiry, responding to uncertainty, and deciding how to communicate information. The book argues that values can influence science in these ways without harming scientific objectivity—in fact, making value judgments more explicit actually promotes objectivity. In place of the value-free ideal, the scientific community should strive to meet three conditions for addressing values appropriately: (1) the influences of values should be made transparent; (2) values should reflect ethical and social priorities; and (3) values should be scrutinized via processes of engagement that incorporate multiple stakeholders. The book explores multiple engagement strategies that can help bring values to light and subject them to critical scrutiny.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–342 of 342

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Elliott, K. C.
Corresponding author
Elliott, Kevin C.
ORCID
Elliott, Kevin C.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2017-02-03
DOI
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001
OpenAlex
W2577177528
Cited by
343
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 2
FWCI
26.51
Type
book
Language
fi
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
values in science, value-free ideal, scientific objectivity, stakeholder engagement, science and ethics, climate science, chemical risk assessment, biomedical research, science communication, scientific uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review