The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competing by Design
Abstract
detriment of their social and human consequences. A technocrat is analytical, intense, extremely rigid, methodical, uncompromising, detail-oriented, and often brilliant. Technocrats build walls around their emotions and lack self-knowledge. Perceiving themselves incapable of making mistakes, technocrats blame others for their faults. A technocrat's strategic vision, if it can be called that, is fixated on analyzing in excruciating detail the vision another has created. Incapable of creating themselves, Technocrats pass themselves off as brilliant because of their analytical and technical virtuosity. They're big on organizational charts. Very big on systems and structures and rules, Pitcher says.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12639 · Cited by 2,550
The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.642 · Cited by 1,731
Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory
Nambisan, S. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389914 · Cited by 1,026
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadler, D. A., Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, M. B.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1997-10-16
- OpenAlex
- W2496450394
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competing by Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195099171.001.0001
- The paper
- Nadler, D. A., Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, M. B. (1997). Competing by Design. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195099171.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
