The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Science of Emotional IntelligenceKnowns and Unknowns
Abstract
During the past decade, emotional intelligence has been subjected to both scientific and public scrutiny. Numerous articles have been published on the topic in both academic journals and the popular press, testifying to the potential usefulness of emotional intelligence in psychology, business, education, the home, and the workplace. However, until now there has been no systematic synthesis that grounds emotional intelligence in contemporary theory while simultaneously sorting scientific approaches from popular fads and pseudoscience. Bringing together experts from a variety of sub-disciplines, this book aims to integrate recent research on emotional intelligence. The contributors address a set of focused questions concerning theory, measures, and applications: How does emotional intelligence relate to personality? What is the optimal approach to testing emotional intelligence? How can emotional intelligence be trained? In the final section of the book, the editors distill and synthesize the main points made by these experts, and set forth an agenda for building a science of emotional intelligence in the future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism.
Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.842 · Cited by 1,006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Increasing emotional intelligence: (How) is it possible?
Nelis, D., Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Hansenne, M. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.046 · Cited by 558
Nelis, D., Kotsou, I., Quoidbach, J., Hansenne, M., Weytens, F., Dupuis, P., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0021554 · Cited by 472
Emotional plasticity: Conditions and effects of improving emotional competence in adulthood.
Kotsou, I., Nelis, D., Grégoire, J., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023047 · Cited by 335
Intelligent Assistive Technology for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias: A Systematic Review
Ienca, M., Fabrice, J., Elger, B., Caon, M., Scoccia Pappagallo, A., Kressig, R. W., & Wangmo, T. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-161037 · Cited by 292
Parker, J. D. A., Taylor, R. N., Eastabrook, J. M., Schell, S. L., & Wood, L. M. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.018 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-11-27
- OpenAlex
- W85402463
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- emotional intelligence, emotional intelligence theory, emotional intelligence assessment, emotional intelligence training, personality, workplace applications, education, pseudoscience, future research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review