Cited by 335Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceSocial Skills and EducationPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Emotional plasticity: Conditions and effects of improving emotional competence in adulthood.

Kotsou, Ilios, Nelis, Delphine, Grégoire, Jacques, Mikolajczak, Moïra·2011·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate (a) whether it is possible to increase emotional competence (EC) in adulthood; (b) whether this improvement results in better mental, physical, and social adjustment; (c) whether this improvement can be maintained 1 year later; and (d) whether these benefits are accompanied by a reduction in stress-hormone secretion (i.e., cortisol). One hundred and thirty-two participants were randomly assigned to an EC-enhancing intervention (in group format) or to a control group. Participants in the intervention group underwent a specifically designed 15-hr intervention targeting the 5 core emotional competencies, complemented with a 4-week e-mail follow-up. Results reveal that the level of emotional competencies increased significantly in the intervention group in contrast with the control group. This increase resulted in lower cortisol secretion, enhanced subjective and physical well-being, as well as improved quality of social and marital relationships in the intervention group. No significant change occurred in the control group. Peer reports on EC and quality of relationships confirmed these results. These data suggest that emotional competencies can be improved, with effective benefits on personal and interpersonal functioning lasting for at least 1 year. The theoretical implications of these results as well as their practical implications for the construction and the development of effective emotional competencies interventions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023047

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in trait EI after training are evident after a few weeks of training and are maintained for at least one year subsequently.

    “These changes are evident after a few weeks of training and are maintained for at least one year subsequently (Kotsou, Nelis, Gregoire, & Mikolajczak, 2011).”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Kotsou, Nelis, Gregoire, & Mikolajczak, 2011

  • The second documented benefit is an improvement in self-reported physical health.

    “The second benefit is an improvement in selfreported physical health, which is also reflected in biological changes, such as a 14% drop in diurnal cortisol secretion in Kotsou et al.'s (2011) study and a 9.7% drop in glycated hemoglobin in Karahan and Yalcin's (2009) study.”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Kotsou et al., 2011

  • In Kotsou et al.'s (2011) study, there was a 14% drop in diurnal cortisol secretion.

    “The second benefit is an improvement in selfreported physical health, which is also reflected in biological changes, such as a 14% drop in diurnal cortisol secretion in Kotsou et al.'s (2011) study and a 9.7% drop in glycated hemoglobin in Karahan and Yalcin's (2009) study.”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Kotsou et al., 2011

  • The third documented benefit is improved quality of marital and social relationships.

    “The third documented benefit is improved quality of marital and social relationships (Kotsou et al., 2011), with a remarkable agreement between participant and spouse (or friend) reports.”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Kotsou et al., 2011

  • In Kotsou et al.'s (2011) study, there was remarkable agreement between participant and spouse (or friend) reports.

    “The third documented benefit is improved quality of marital and social relationships (Kotsou et al., 2011), with a remarkable agreement between participant and spouse (or friend) reports.”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Kotsou et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 129 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotsou, I., Nelis, D., Grégoire, J., & Mikolajczak, M.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
827-839
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2153901098
Cited by
335
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Région Wallonne
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
emotional competence, cortisol, stress hormones, well-being, social adaptation, marital relationships, interpersonal functioning, adult development, intervention maintenance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Belgium, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychotherapy, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Cultural Competency, Emotional Intelligence, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review