The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Perils of Federalism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coercive state authority, such as authoritarian policing and mass incarceration, is mostly administered with state-level authority.
“Coercive state authority, seen in extreme forms in authoritarian policing and mass incarceration, are also mostly administered with state-level authority (Miller 2008; Soss and Weaver 2017; Weaver and Prowse 2020).”
From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Miller 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding
GRUMBACH, J. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000934 · Cited by 135
“Coercive state authority, seen in extreme forms in authoritarian policing and mass incarceration, are also mostly administered with state-level authority (Miller 2008; Soss and Weaver 2017; Weaver and Prowse 2020).”
BackgroundNo Justice, No Peace: Political Science Perspectives on the American Carceral State
Harris, A. P., Walker, H. L., & Eckhouse, L. (2020) · The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2020.21 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, L. L.
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Lisa L.
- ORCID
- Miller, Lisa L.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-08-28
- OpenAlex
- W2487164816
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 18.44
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Keywords
- federalism, centralization, regionalism, constitutional design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
