Cited by 14Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyPolicing Practices and Perceptions

No Justice, No Peace: Political Science Perspectives on the American Carceral State

Harris, Allison P., Walker, Hannah L., Eckhouse, Laurel·2020·The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics

Abstract

This essay explores four key dimensions of political science literature on the U.S. criminal legal system, by way of introducing articles in the special issue on criminal justice featured in the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Politics. We situate police as an institution of social control, rather than providing safety for people vulnerable to crime. The vast array of policy tools to surveil, track, and detain citizens, which lack commensurate restraints on their application, amount to a finely tuned carceral machine that can be deployed against groups newly identified as deviant. We therefore turn attention to this dynamic with our second theme: the criminalization of immigrants, the expansion of interior immigration enforcement, and the consequent targeting of Latinx people. We likewise discuss lessons for reform that can be drawn from research on representation and the political socialization that occurs as a consequence of involuntary contact with the system. We conclude with a brief discussion of directions for future research. The criminal legal system is a key force for persistent racial and class inequality. By turning attention to the politics of the criminal legal system, we forward a critical and understudied facet of American political life that intersects with all corners of the discipline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/rep.2020.21

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent years, American political scientists have introduced new questions, focusing on how carceral institutions shape individuals' relationship with the state.

    “In recent years, American political scientists have introduced new questions, focusing on how carceral institutions shape individuals' relationship with the state (Harris et al., 2020), work that Canadian political science can better contribute to regarding the Canadian case study.”

    From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Harris et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 125 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. NYU Press. “Race, Ethnicity, and Policing.” https://nyupress.org/9780814776162/race-ethnicity-and-policing (Accessed June 13, 2020).
  2. Jackson, J. M. 2019. Race, Risks, and Responses: Mapping Black Americans' Reactions to Group Threat (Doctoral Dissertation).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, A. P., Walker, H. L., & Eckhouse, L.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, Hannah L.
Venue
The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
427-449
ISSN
2056-6085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095598226
Cited by
14
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
criminal justice system, criminalization of immigrants, Latinx people, racial inequality, class inequality, political socialization, criminal justice reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review