The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do Experiences Have Contents?
Abstract
This paper argues that despite the differences between perception and belief, perception involves states that are importantly similar to beliefs: conscious visual experiences. According to the Content View, these experiences have contents in the form of accuracy conditions. The paper develops and defends the Content View, discusses its significance, and argues that contrary to what is often supposed, the Content View is compatible with Naive Realist disjunctivism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceptual representation, veridicality, and the interface theory of perception
Cohen, J. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0782-3 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegel, S.
- Corresponding author
- Siegel, Susanna
- ORCID
- Siegel, Susanna
- Venue
- Perceiving the World
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-09-10
- Pages
- 333-368
- OpenAlex
- W2498052323
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 22.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Keywords
- content of experience, visual awareness, perception, belief, content views, naive realism, disjunctivism, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
