The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding and Representing SpaceTheory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children
Abstract
This book breaks new ground in the understanding of how one perceives and represent the space around people — one of the central topics in cognitive psychology. It presents a new view of development and spatial cognition by reversing the usual focus on vision and examining the evidence on representation in the total absence of vision without specific brain damage. Findings from the work with congenitally totally blind and with sighted children, together with studies from a wide variety of other areas, are set in the context of intersensory and spatial development. Touch and movement are considered as converging sources of reference information with and without vision. The findings have important implications for future work in many fields, particularly developmental psychology, cognition, cognitive neuroscience, and visual handicap.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This contributes to cognitive overload during Web interaction (Millar, 1994;Thinus-Blanc and Gaunet, 1997).”
From Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems (2010) · cites this paper as Millar, 1994
In the citing paper
“people who are blind or visually impaired (BVI), particularly those with early-onset and total blindness, exhibit a range of spatial deficits on spatial learning and wayfinding behaviors as compared to their sighted peers”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Millar, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M.-P., Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380526a0 · Cited by 1,253
Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2009) · Attention, Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.71.7.1439 · Cited by 1,108
Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex
Graziano, M. S. A., Hu, X. T., & Gross, C. G. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2268 · Cited by 603
Norman, J. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0200002x · Cited by 466
Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals
Schinazi, V. R., Thrash, T., & Chebat, D. (2016) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1375 · Cited by 227
The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition
Pasqualotto, A., & Proulx, M. J. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.008 · Cited by 192
Tactile acuity, aging, and braille reading in long-term blindness.
Stevens, J. C., Foulke, E., & Patterson, M. Q. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.2.2.91 · Cited by 147
Superior Serial Memory in the Blind: A Case of Cognitive Compensatory Adjustment
Raz, N., Striem, E., Pundak, G., Orlov, T., & Zohary, E. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.060 · Cited by 113
Postma, A., Zuidhoek, S., Noordzij, M. L., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2007) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5441 · Cited by 110
Navigating without vision: principles of blind spatial cognition
Giudice, N. A. (2018) · Handbook of Behavioral and Cognitive Geography · doi:10.4337/9781784717544.00024 · Cited by 111
Navigation using sensory substitution in real and virtual mazes
Chebat, D.-R., Maidenbaum, S., & Amedi, A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126307 · Cited by 99
Giudice, N. A., Guenther, B. A., Jensen, N. A., & Haase, K. N. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00087 · Cited by 60
“…those with early-onset and total blindness, exhibit a range of spatial deficits on spatial learning and wayfinding behaviors as compared to their sighted peers (for reviews, see Golledge, 1993; Millar, 1994; Thinus-Blanc and Gaunet, 1997; Ungar, 2000; Long and Giudice, 2010; Schinazi et al., 2016).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems
The University of North Carolina - Greensboro, Babu, R., Singh, R., The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, U., Ganesh, J., & Limited, I. T. (2010) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00015 · Cited by 59
Updated tactile feedback with a pin array matrix helps blind people to reduce self-location errors
Brayda, L., Leo, F., Baccelliere, C., Ferrari, E., & Vigini, C. (2018) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi9070351 · Cited by 33
“For instance, blind individuals might prefer route-like representations of spatial information while those who are sighted tend to code spatial information as survey-like representations [9,10].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Millar, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Millar, Susanna
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1994-10-27
- OpenAlex
- W1783251216
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- spatial cognition, spatial representation, congenital blindness, blind children, spatial development, touch, movement, reference information, visual deprivation, cognitive development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
