The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is Music an Evolutionary Adaptation?
Abstract
This chapter reviews the basic arguments related to evolutionary claims for music. In particular, it describes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Before entertaining some possible evolutionary views of music's origins, first it considers two pertinent complicating points of views. One view is that music is a form of nonadaptive pleasure seeking (NAPS). A second view is that music is an evolutionary vestige. It then measures the adaptive value of music. Of the various proposals concerning a possible evolutionary origin for music, eight broad theories can be identified: mate selection, social cohesion, group effort, perceptual development, motor skill development, conflict reduction, safe time passing and transgenerational communication. There are four types of evidence considered in presenting a case for the evolutionary origins of music. Next, it reports some of the archaeological, anthropological, and ethological facts. Moreover, it explores some of the evolutionary arguments that have been advanced to account for the origins of language. The evidence on music and social bonding is shown. Furthermore, a discussion on music and social function, social bonding and hormones, oxytocin and the biology of social bonding, and mood regulation is provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notably, it has been argued that singing, as well as other musical activities, may have evolved as a mechanism of social bonding [23–25].”
From The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding
Pearce, E., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150221 · Cited by 507
Music and Language: A Developmental Comparison
McMullen, E., & Saffran, J. R. (2004) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2004.21.3.289 · Cited by 317
Brattico, E., & Pearce, M. T. (2013) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0031624 · Cited by 310
Cognitive and socioemotional caregiving in developing countries
Bornstein, M. H., & Putnick, D. L. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01673.x · Cited by 274
The role of music in adolescent development: much more than the same old song
Miranda, D. (2012) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2011.650182 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Huron, D.
- Corresponding author
- Huron, David
- ORCID
- Huron, David
- Venue
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2003-07-10
- Pages
- 57-75
- OpenAlex
- W4245047179
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- evolution of music, natural selection, mate choice, social cohesion, social bonding, oxytocin, hormones, mood regulation, origin of language, ethology, music archaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review