Cited by 2,432Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Working Memory, Thought, and Action

Baddeley, Alan·2007·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

This book is the magnum opus of one of the most influential cognitive psychologists of the past 50 years. This new volume on the model he created (with Graham Hitch) discusses the developments that have occurred in the past 20 years, and places it within a broader context. Working memory is a temporary storage system that underpins onex' capacity for coherent thought. Some 30 years ago, Baddeley and Hitch proposed a way of thinking about working memory that has proved to be both valuable and influential in its application to practical problems. This book updates the theory, discussing both the evidence in its favour, and alternative approaches. In addition, it discusses the implications of the model for understanding social and emotional behaviour, concluding with an attempt to place working memory in a broader biological and philosophical context. Inside are chapters on the phonological loop, the visuo-spatial sketchpad, the central executive and the episodic buffer. There are also chapters on the relevance to working memory of studies of the recency effect, of work based on individual differences, and of neuroimaging research. The broader implications of the concept of working memory are discussed in the chapters on social psychology, anxiety, depression, consciousness, and on the control of action. Finally, the author discusses the relevance of a concept of working memory to the classic problems of consciousness and free will.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper defines executive functions as interrelated higher-order cognitive processes that allow goal-directed behavior and novel problem solving.

    “Executive functions refer to a set of interrelated, higher-order cognitive processes that enable goal directed behavior and novel problem solving (Baddeley, 2007; Miyake et al., 2000).”

    From Executive Functioning Heterogeneity in Pediatric ADHD (2019) · cites this paper as Baddeley, 2007

  • The working memory system has a single central executive controller that operates on functionally and anatomically separate phonological and visuospatial short-term memory subsystems.

    “These approaches are based on compelling evidence that the working memory system is characterized by a single central executive controller that operates on the functionally and anatomically separate phonological and visuospatial short-term memory subsystems (Baddeley, 2007; Alloway et al., 2006; Smith et al., 1996).”
  • Because all working memory tasks place demands on short-term memory systems, failing to control for short-term memory is likely to suppress working memory deficit estimates when short-term memory is less impaired or intact in ADHD.

    “Because all working memory tasks inherently include demands on one or more short-term memory systems (Baddeley, 2007), failure to control for short-term memory abilities is likely to suppress estimates of working memory deficits to the extent that short-term memory abilities are less- or un-impaired in ADHD as suggested below.”
  • The Baddeley (2007) model has considerable empirical support and has been widely used in ADHD research.

    “the Baddeley (2007) model has considerable empirical support and has been used extensively in the ADHD literature”
  • Residual phonological and visuospatial short-term memory scores correlate negatively with each other, which appears to contradict their structural and functional independence.

    “In other words, the residual phonological and visuospatial short-term memory scores will correlate negatively with each other – a finding that appears contradictory to theory and evidence for their structural and functional independence (Baddeley, 2007; Gibson et al., 2017).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 2,432

Authors
Baddeley, A.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Baddeley, Alan
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2007-03-15
OpenAlex
W1722621474
Cited by
2,432
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 134 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 146 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 122
FWCI
65.39
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory, Baddeley-Hitch model, phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, central executive, episodic buffer, recency effect, individual differences, social behavior, emotional behavior, anxiety, depression, consciousness, free will, action control, thought and action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review