The Biology of Temporary Waters
Abstract
Temporary waters are found throughout the world, including intermittent streams and ponds, episodic rain puddles, seasonal limestone lakes, and the water-retaining structures of plants, such as bromeliads and pitcher plants. They are populated by a variety of plant, animal, and microscopic communities ranging from the very simple to the highly complex. As such, they represent fascinating and significant arenas to study the properties of species, as the latter deals with the rigours of living in highly variable environments. Obligate temporary water species display a remarkable array of adaptations to the periodic loss of their primary medium that largely sets them apart from the inhabitants of permanent water bodies. The survival of individuals frequently depends upon exceptional physiological tolerance or effective migrational abilities that are timed to appropriate habitat phases. However, apart from their inherent biological interest, temporary waters are now in the limelight from a conservation perspective as these habitats come more and more into conflict with human activities. Traditionally, many temporary waters — be they ponds, pools, streams, or wetlands — have been considered as ‘wasted’ areas of land, potentially convertible to agriculture once drained. In reality, they are natural features of the global landscape representing distinct and unique habitats for many species — some that are found nowhere else, others that reach their maximum abundance there. Temporary waters are also very important from a human health perspective, since they function as breeding places for the vectors of many disease organisms.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intermittent Rivers: A Challenge for Freshwater Ecology
Datry, T., Larned, S. T., & Tockner, K. (2014) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/bit027 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective
Lehmann, T., & Diabate, A. (2008) · Infection, Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.003 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Running dry: Freshwater biodiversity, protected areas and climate change
Pittock, J., Hansen, L. J., & Abell, R. (2008) · Biodiversity · doi:10.1080/14888386.2008.9712905 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Koetsier, P., & McCauley, L. M. M. (2015) · Western North American Naturalist · doi:10.3398/064.075.0303 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Williams, D. D.
- Corresponding author
- Williams, D. Dudley
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- OpenAlex
- W2561237100
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- temporary water bodies, intermittent streams, ponds, seasonal lakes, Bromeliaceae, pitcher plants, physiological tolerance, migration timing, conservation, wetland conservation, disease vectors, breeding habitat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review