Making Things Valuable
Open accessAbstract
Studies of worth and valuation have to a large extent been shaped by an implicit division of labour in which economists have dominated discussions of monetary value and sociologists have been occupied with understanding other values such as those with a religious or cultural basis. The book contributes to an emergent strand of economic sociology that challenges this division of labour. The book consists of an introduction and twelve chapters that in combination provide insights into important ‘mechanisms and practices of valuing’ that deserve closer academic examination. It illustrates how practices such as calculating, framing, modelling, searching, institutionalizing, and visualizing are pivotal elements of how things are made valuable. It supports a processual view of valuation that suggests moving the analytical gaze from things towards the network of elements and the evaluative infrastructure that makes them valuable. The emphasis of the contributions is accordingly on the process of making things valuable: through which practices, technologies, and devices are objects e-valuated? How are things commensurated, compared, categorized, and classified? What accounts make some things count more than others? These questions are significant, for it is through valuation practices that the world is ordered, hierarchized, and ultimately valued. The chapters in the book illustrate how this is so in empirical settings as diverse as university ranking lists, ice skating scoring, wind power, insurances, gold, and big data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation
Lamont, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 · Cited by 1,492 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Self-citationSourcing newness: ways of inducing indeterminacy
Hutter, M., & Farías, I. (2017) · Journal of Cultural Economy · doi:10.1080/17530350.2017.1326969 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kornberger, M., Justesen, L., Mouritsen, J., & Koed Madsen, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2015-08-01
- OpenAlex
- W2507050018
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- WU Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Value Engineering and Management
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- valuation, economic sociology, monetary value, commensuration, categorization, ranking, wind energy, insurance, gold, big data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review