Belief in the Face of Controversy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rather than adopting a conciliatory stance that would have aligned him with prevailing beliefs, Abraham pursued a rational process of inquiry to strengthen his conviction.
“Rather than adopting a conciliatory stance that would have aligned him with prevailing beliefs, he pursued a rational process of inquiry to strengthen his conviction.”
From Conciliationism as Epistemic Concession in Religious Peer Disagreement (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
According to the Torah, Bible, and Qur'an, Abraham rejected the dominant polytheism of his milieu, affirming monotheism and engaging in a deep conflict with his cultural environment.
“According to the Torah, Bible, and Qur'an, Abraham rejected the dominant polytheism of his milieu, instead affirming monotheism, engaging in a deep conflict with his cultural environment.”
From Conciliationism as Epistemic Concession in Religious Peer Disagreement (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conciliationism as Epistemic Concession in Religious Peer Disagreement
Aslantatar, N. (2025) · İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi · doi:10.29288/ilted.1657637 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kornblith, H.
- Corresponding author
- Kornblith, Hilary
- ORCID
- Kornblith, Hilary
- Venue
- Disagreement
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-08-05
- Pages
- 29-52
- OpenAlex
- W4232405443
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 60.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- belief, controversy, epistemology of belief, belief formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
