The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development
Abstract
Conflict around wind farm development has stimulated interest in ‘community benefits’ – the provision of financial or material benefits by the developers to the area affected by these facilities. By and large, both policy makers and researchers have couched the rationale for community benefits in instrumental terms, i.e. that an increased flow of community benefits will improve the social acceptability of these facilities and thereby expedite planning consent. This paper questions this conventional rationale. Proponents of this rationale neglect the institutionally structured terrain of the planning process; the provision of community benefits can shift in significance depending on whether or not the ‘affected community’ has any significant influence over wind farm projects. Similarly, our discourse analysis conducted in Wales shows that community benefits are seen predominantly as compensation for impacts, without any clear implication that they should change social attitudes. Our conclusion is that the dominant, instrumental rationale for community benefits obscures other, equally important justifications: the role of community benefits in promoting environmental justice; and how flows of community benefits might better serve the long-term sustainability of wind farm development areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation.
C., M., & Sen, A. (1982) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1973011 · Cited by 4,906
Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment
Segerson, K., Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1991) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146419 · Cited by 2,308
Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation
Kurien, C. T., & Sen, A. (1983) · Social Scientist · doi:10.2307/3517051 · Cited by 2,041
Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 · Cited by 1,796
Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy
Devine‐Wright, P. (2005) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.124 · Cited by 1,309
Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · Cited by 1,284
Community renewable energy: What should it mean?
Walker, G., & Devine-Wright, P. (2008) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · Cited by 1,008
Gross, C. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013 · Cited by 918
van der Horst, D. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012 · Cited by 849
The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses
Bell, D., Gray, T., & Haggett, C. (2005) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010500175833 · Cited by 823
Cited by
Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse
Schlosberg, D. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 · Cited by 1,214
Wolsink, M. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-557
- ISSN
- 0964-0568 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0559
- OpenAlex
- W2050270104
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 57.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047
- The paper
- Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011). Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.