The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiculturalism and the Welfare State
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Crossnational studies show that countries which have gone farther down the road of embracing multiculturalism policies have on average fared as well as other countries in maintaining social spending, in maintaining public support for redistributive programs, and in maintaining attitudes of inclusive solidarity (Banting & Kymlicka, 2006, (in press;) Brady & Finnigan 2014; Kesler & Bloem”
From Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism (2015) · cites this paper as Banting & Kymlicka, 2006
In the citing paper
“Despite the pessimistic claims of some of the earliest proponents of the progressive ' s dilemma, it is now clear that there is no inherent or universal tendency for multiculturalism to drive down solidarity.”
From Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism (2015) · cites this paper as Banting & Kymlicka, 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koopmans, R. (2009) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/13691830903250881 · Cited by 559
“My argument is not the more common one that immigration and ethnic diversity undermine support for the welfare state (see Barry 2001; Phillips 1999; and counterarguments in Banting and Kymlicka 2006).”
BackgroundKymlicka, W. (2010) · International Social Science Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2451.2010.01750.x · Cited by 481
“(This and the following lists of multicultural policies are taken from the index of multicultural policies developed in Banting and Kymlicka 2006): recognition of land rights and title recognition of self-government rights upholding historic treaties and/or signing new treaties recognition of…”
BackgroundSelf-citationSolidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism
Kymlicka, W. (2015) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4 · Cited by 382
Self-citationAngry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party
Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. (2010) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.x · Cited by 324
“Journal compilation © 2010 Political Studies Association POLITICAL STUDIES: 2010, 58(1) ethnically and religiously different to themselves (see Banting and Kymlicka, 2006 for a review).”
BackgroundWright, M., & Bloemraad, I. (2012) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711004919 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2006-11-23
- OpenAlex
- W2506381623
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 18.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- multiculturalism, welfare state, social policy, cultural diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
