The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making
Abstract
This book argues that identities based on race and gender affect how Black women legislate. Unlike other studies that only analyze intergroup variances, this book examines intragroup differences among Maryland’s African American women legislators. It develops representational identity theory to examine when and why Black women state legislators will behave similarly or have divergent policy preferences and uses intragroup analysis to compare and contrast the political behavior and policy preferences of Black women elected to the Maryland state legislature. Due in part to common experiences with racism and sexism, it becomes clear that Black women in the Maryland state legislature have developed mechanisms for deciding when collective interests should become stronger or weaker than their individual interests. In political contexts where race and gender intersect, African American women are likely to cite their race and gender identities as factors in their legislative decision making. Thus, Black women form a cohesive bloc in the legislature when policies specifically impact minority women, and at other times they employ divergent legislative strategies and policy prescriptions to address issues.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns
Ward, O. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161216673195 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, N. E.
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Nadia E.
- ORCID
- Brown, Nadia E.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-04-09
- OpenAlex
- W4236948208
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- African American women in politics, intersectionality, race and gender, legislative decision-making, policy preferences, minority women, collective interests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review