Cited by 240Gender Politics and RepresentationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making

Brown, Nadia E.·2014·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

This book argues that identities based on race and gender affect how Black women legislate. Unlike other studies that only analyze intergroup variances, this book examines intragroup differences among Maryland’s African American women legislators. It develops representational identity theory to examine when and why Black women state legislators will behave similarly or have divergent policy preferences and uses intragroup analysis to compare and contrast the political behavior and policy preferences of Black women elected to the Maryland state legislature. Due in part to common experiences with racism and sexism, it becomes clear that Black women in the Maryland state legislature have developed mechanisms for deciding when collective interests should become stronger or weaker than their individual interests. In political contexts where race and gender intersect, African American women are likely to cite their race and gender identities as factors in their legislative decision making. Thus, Black women form a cohesive bloc in the legislature when policies specifically impact minority women, and at other times they employ divergent legislative strategies and policy prescriptions to address issues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199352432.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, N. E.
Corresponding author
Brown, Nadia E.
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2014-04-09
OpenAlex
W4236948208
Cited by
240
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.05
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
African American women in politics, intersectionality, race and gender, legislative decision-making, policy preferences, minority women, collective interests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review