The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Religious Secularity: Shiite Repudiation of the Islamic State
Abstract
In the latter decades of the 20th century, secularism and Muslim politics appeared to be on a collision course. Although 9/11 arguably marked the peak of militant Islam, it also spurred many Muslims to speak up for moderate versions of political Islam. The new millennium has also witnessed the emergence of a more robust debate on secularism and its many approaches and practices. As a result, the Islamism/secularism dichotomy has come under rigorous scrutiny as Muslim thinkers reconceptualize state–religion relations. This book examines the ways by which Iranian Shiite scholars have re-articulated state–religion–society relations beyond the Islamic state paradigm. Despite its promises, the Islamic state has systematically prioritized political considerations over religious precepts, inadvertently generating a reformist religious discourse that questions the very foundations of the Islamic state. This book investigates this counter-discourse by developing the seemingly oxymoronic term “religious secularity” to highlight the paradoxes inherent in the Islamic state ideal.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Khomeini's jurisprudential innovation has been conceptualized as the expedient jurisprudence.
“This jurisprudential innovation of Khomeini has been conceptualized as the expedient jurisprudence”
From Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence (2022) · cites this paper as Ghobadzadeh 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13020126 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghobadzadeh, N.
- Corresponding author
- Ghobadzadeh, Naser
- ORCID
- Ghobadzadeh, Naser
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- OpenAlex
- W2501091733
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Keywords
- secularism, political Islam, Islamic State, state-religion relations, Islamic reform, militant Islam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review