The DOI matches its Crossref record.
13 The Chronicon Paschale and the Origins of the Byzantine Era
Abstract
Abstract The Byzantine form of the Alexandrian cycle emerged in the 7th century, with an era of creation corresponding to 5509/8 BC and a cycle that began with the 14th day of the moon on 2 April. The Byzantine cycle and its era were adaptations of an innovation proposed by the author of the Chronicon Paschale. That text uses a 19‐year cycle beginning from the 14th day of the moon on 13 April and acalendar that began on Wednesday, 21 March 5509 BC. The authors of the Byzantine cycle accepted Sunday 18 March 5509 BC as the date of creation, but numbered the years from 1 September 5509 BC, in synchronism with the civil calendar. They also moved the saltus from the end of the 19th year to the end of the 17th so as to yield a sequence of epacts in agreement with the Alexandrian cycle.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Mosshammer, A. A.
- Corresponding author
- Mosshammer, Alden A.
- Venue
- The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2008-10-16
- Pages
- 278-316
- OpenAlex
- W2497975630
- Semantic Scholar
- c8dadb3f31fedac475bd803d87d62bee2b97ab6e
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- epact, saltus, creation date, Byzantine calendar, 7th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review