Cited by 528Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsPhilosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation

Wallace, David·2012·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Presenting a striking new account of the 'many worlds' approach to quantum theory, aka the Everett interpretation, David Wallace offers a clear and up-to-date survey of work on this theory in physics and in philosophy of science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546961.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wallace, D.
Corresponding author
Wallace, David
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2012-05-24
OpenAlex
W4251082868
Cited by
528
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.45
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
many-worlds interpretation, quantum mechanics, multiverse, philosophy of quantum mechanics, David Wallace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review